Being buried in an important cemetery provides some measure of permanence and protection ?
And complicates recovery quite a bit, apparently.
Also the graves in a National Cemetery are marked off by numbers and sections, would not be to hard to locate a grave.
True, but that's not the only way to locate a buried object of value precisely enough to be recovered later - if the treasure legends are to be believed, anyway. Oak Island would seem to suggest otherwise, but plenty of folks are convinced that they have the answer.
So is a good friend of mine. He's not guarding any treasure.
...and a member of the Knight's Templar.
No, he was not.
As I have a letter written by him verifying this fact.
I can write you a letter verifying the fact that the Ark of the Covenant is buried underneath the ex-USS Parche. I'm rather trustworthy. I can have a Master Mason attest to my trustworthiness if that would help. But would that make the contents of my letter accurate?
Why he and no one else, was entrusted with the wealth of the KGC or the CSA Treasury is another difficult question to find an answer to also.
It's rather easy to answer, depending on one's beliefs about the KGC and the CSA's chronic problems with lacking money, and treasure legends in general.
Ten of the treasure depositories are listed under President Jefferson Davis' name. Two are listed under General John Breckenridge's name and they are the local treasures in around Danville, Virginia. All of the other 46 depositories are listed under landowner's or sentinels names, most own the land where these treasures were buried.
Listed where? Who authored that list?
Whether they later recovered any of the large treasures is not known as they could have used them for reconstruction. But as of 1884 to 1886 most of these depositories were still there and still loaded with treasure.
So the treasures were certainly there, but they may not be now, and we have no way of knowing for sure because even though we have some important names attached to them, we don't actually have locations. So even if I were to dig in the right location, I might come away with absolutely nothing. Is that a fair assessment of this scenario?
I do know that local depositories were visited by Jesse and Frank James in late 1879 and early 1880.
Do you know, or do you suspect?
If you were involved in this KGC business in 1879-1880, why in the heck would you ever let a notorious robber near your secret treasure? What could possibly be gained from that, and what might possibly be lost?
I am sorry about getting this thread off on to the Confederate Treasure instead of Oak Island but it seems at least to me all treasures are connected in one way or another.
It's all good. I enjoy the discussion.
If you were to refine that comment to "..it seems at least to me that all treasure legends are connected in one particular way," I would be 100% in agreement with you, because most of them are.