Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And to the point about anyone representing us being or not being a good miner, I think that's aiming your concern in the wrong direction. When I want someone to represent me to legislators and regulators I'm more concerned with their public speaking ability, professional decorum, and overall knowledge of the law. Year after year regulation has passed that shows they (the govt) isn't concerned with technical details. Watch anyone testify to Congress or the CA state Senate. It's not detailed technical questions, they're legislators, not miners. We need people to represent us that can handle that end of it. That's vastly different than knowing the intricacies of how to look for and recover gold.
Yes via the 'New" half of PLP. Wegner. Klauwiener(sp?) and two other dudes in the historically mining rich "Thousand Oaks District" of L.A. county. They are actively pursuing money because the bank accounts are frozen.Is the MMAC still taking payments through the PLP, just curious?
Actually I think that's why they formed a corp. The promise of service they make is so broad stroke, that it would be pretty difficult to allege fraud. Not much tangible what they profess to provide. So, it'd buyer beware really.I would and will not give the MMAC a dime considering they have no clue when it comes to dealing with money's sent to them. Maybe they should check into money laundering laws, I'm pretty sure their already there.
Disagree 1000% what has been shown by most pushing districts is that they do not understand Mining Law or mining. Look at J Mortari.
We need people who speak well but, also that know what the hell they are talking about. Mining districts are good. They are not going to bring back dredging however.
It matters to miners and prospectors. We need to work on us representing us better. It's called vested interest and it matters.
I don't know if you have noticed but, pretty much everyone in the legislature has vested interest in their jobs only. Look where that has gotten us. People writing law and regulation in areas they don't actually participate. I consider it a huge negative if your all about something that you don't actually know all that much about.
It give the impression of ulterior motives.
There are quite a few miners dealing with lobbying and legislation and they are the most effective because of their industry technical knowledge. Sorry Bob , but there is a reason that these guys that aren't familiar with being on site have no business lobbying. The strongest Lobbying groups for mining in the U.S. are staffed by miners, geologists and mining engineers.Close, but the only vested interest the legislators have is in representing those that have caught their attention, usually via large monetary donations to their reelection campaigns. Who has been representing the small scale miner for years? Almost no one, and when we are represented, it's typically it's miners themselves that stand up and say something.
No other industry relies on the industry members directly to be their own representation. They organize and hire professionals to do the representation. If you want to keep using amateurs, be my guest, but government overreach in California shows you what that has accomplished. If you go back and read my posts, I'm only talking about the need for our industry to start using professional representation. Not once did I mention that professional representation would be obtainable with MMAC. Good luck finding actual professional representation that has a personal vested interest in small scale mining. They're going to be very few and far between.
And I'll say it again, I don't feel at this time any mining district should align with MMAC. Their strong armed tactics alone scream that they're not really out to represent me or my district.