BabyNeedsANewPairO'Shoes
Sr. Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
- Messages
- 273
- Reaction score
- 108
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Springfield, MO
- Detector(s) used
- Garrett AT Gold
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
I'm a skeptic.
We have far more advanced electronics available to us than our metal detecting fathers...the power of discrimination of our equipment is far more developed, we have exponentially greater access to historical information at the click of a mouse than we did when I first began metal detecting in the 1970s. I can write this post on one screen on my computer while I research potential historical sites on the other. Yet some of us still think that by calling on a medieval belief in a supernatural force we can somehow tap into is still necessary to be successful at the art of treasure hunting.
Here's a link to a page that discusses the pseudo-science of dowsing. From that page you can download a two volume paper that describes a scientific- scientific double-blind study in Germany that tested the effecasy of dowsing for both water and coins. I won't tell you the outcome...you can see for yourself.
Library, The Matter of Dowsing
But I will say to the OP, radbro, who apparently is looking into dowsing for the first time, please consider the opportunity cost of going into a field of treasure hunting that depends on arcane, archaic hearsay and superstition. The hours you spend trying to make sense out of divining rods or crystal pendulums or forked sticks are hours you are not spending on your metal detector or researching potential sites using science based tools; tools developed with sound, repeatable, proven scientific theory.
I'd hate to see someone who could, say, learn to be a good pharmacist get side tracked into alchemy. I may, like Fox Mulder, "Want to believe", but I will go where the double-blind science takes me...not my desires.
Best,
Bruce
We have far more advanced electronics available to us than our metal detecting fathers...the power of discrimination of our equipment is far more developed, we have exponentially greater access to historical information at the click of a mouse than we did when I first began metal detecting in the 1970s. I can write this post on one screen on my computer while I research potential historical sites on the other. Yet some of us still think that by calling on a medieval belief in a supernatural force we can somehow tap into is still necessary to be successful at the art of treasure hunting.
Here's a link to a page that discusses the pseudo-science of dowsing. From that page you can download a two volume paper that describes a scientific- scientific double-blind study in Germany that tested the effecasy of dowsing for both water and coins. I won't tell you the outcome...you can see for yourself.
Library, The Matter of Dowsing
But I will say to the OP, radbro, who apparently is looking into dowsing for the first time, please consider the opportunity cost of going into a field of treasure hunting that depends on arcane, archaic hearsay and superstition. The hours you spend trying to make sense out of divining rods or crystal pendulums or forked sticks are hours you are not spending on your metal detector or researching potential sites using science based tools; tools developed with sound, repeatable, proven scientific theory.
I'd hate to see someone who could, say, learn to be a good pharmacist get side tracked into alchemy. I may, like Fox Mulder, "Want to believe", but I will go where the double-blind science takes me...not my desires.
Best,
Bruce
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: