Portugal did become a safe haven (read post preceding this one)and a few did go there, but the new order had been established in 1319 for the members of the Order already there.
Yet they stayed there for a number of years before they'd been granted legitimacy. (And presumably they just kept on doing Templar things.) If everyone was fearing for their lives, I'd expect a mass exodus.
One of the major tools to navigation learned by the Templars from the Arabs in the Eastern Mediterranean was the use of latitude finding tools such as the Kamal and Cross Staff!
Is there a reference somewhere of Europeans using a kamal during that period of time? As for the cross staff, the earliest mention of it in European literature is not far off from the period of time that we're discussing, but the author of that piece was not a Templar.
Or was he? The introduction of the magnetic compass in Europe is actually a bit of a mystery. Don't you want to talk about that?
The Caravel came a little later and does not apply to this part of the story.
But it does! The Portuguese wanted to start doing some real sailing and their ships were holding them back, so they invented a new ship that could do what they needed. That's why I brought it up.
A; None of the waypoints crossing the Atlantic would be hard to find for experienced sailors.
I'm not really sure about that. Even the Norse that had made the trip before missed Iceland sometimes, never mind the smaller islands.
Oh, and if you keep heading East you will get to where you want to be.
East to the New World? I suppose that would work, but that's not the direction that I'd take. Did you mean west?
B; The shores both North and South that you mention were not as close as you seem to indicate.
The north and south shores of the Mediterranean are a hell of a lot closer than the north and the south shores of the Atlantic are. Again, if you find yourself lost in the Mediterranean and you're heading east or west, simply turn north or south. There is a coast there, and you can follow that coast to wherever you're going...which is likely how most sailors were doing it at the time anyway. It's awfully hard to get lost when you have an unchanging landmark constantly in sight, and if something goes wrong on the water, being within sight of land isn't a guarantee of safety but it gives you options.
C; Not as safe as a swimming pool is kind of an understatement is it not. I have never sailed the Mediterranean but I have the Great Lakes (and in the Atlantic) and their bottoms (Great Lakes) are full of ships that thought as you do. Come on to Michigan and I'll take you for a boat ride.
Is the weather on the Great Lakes a lot like the weather in the Mediterranean?
D; We are not in the 1200s, we are in 1307. A few years earlier the Order had purchased some Venetian ships of which they did quite often and when they had others built which were documented by several historians they were of modern (late 13th century) Venetian design with sails for propulsion.
Yes. Those were the crap boats that I mentioned earlier. Again, if the existing ships were good for anything other than coastal runs, the Portuguese wouldn't have bothered inventing something for deep water. There would have been no need.
Just go into it with an open mind. I loved it so much I would forget when it was time for supper. I liked it better than food. Petter Amundsen is a remarkable man with a very intelligent mind. Everyone for the past 400 years including all scholars and all that tried to prove that Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare and not Shakespeare himself. All of these educators and I mean all of them never saw what was written right in front of their eyes. The RC did just like the Knight's Templar and the KGC, they all would put it right out in the open in your face and if you did not look very very closely you would never see it.
Uh...I'm not sure what to say in response to that.
I have been into this kind of thinking which I call abstract thinking and that may be the wrong name but anyway I have been doing the same thing with the KGC for the past seven years. I solved the mystery of the lost Confederate Gold and much of the KGC Gold by not looking at things like others.
I won't ask you about the specifics, but I'll merely leave you with this: if you (or someone else) didn't dig up treasure where your cracked code said that it should be, the code might not actually be cracked.
Petter Amundsen will always be remembered as the man that broke the RC codes in the 400 year old Shakespeare books and plays. If not, I will always hold him in high regard as one of the most intelligent persons of modern times.
If he will always be remembered like that, then there is no sense in clarifying the "if not" case, right?