I started this thread for those of us that read Ryan's research and how Travis Tumlinson faked the Stone Maps. Why would he do this? Only he knows why. Whether or not it was to cover up information on the Trail Maps it brings into question all of his work. We now know according to Ryan's research he did indeed fabricate at least one of the Stone Maps and made many copies of all the Maps with various degree's of deception included in those copies. We also know he was worried he may be sued if the truth came out and anyone had been hurt or killed looking for any Treasures from his Fake Stone Maps. Any reasons Travis may have given for his deeds only adds to the fact he deceived many people in his actions. This is not the ways of an Honest Man. Should we believe anything at all Travis presented during his life?
What is your take on Travis's exploitation of the Dutchman / Peralta Legend?
Do you believe he did it for a good reason or for his own Ego?
What would drive a man with rock carving skills to deceive so many for so long?
Why did he pretend to search for his own fabricated Map locations, or did he really search?
Many have given numerous amounts of time and dedication trying to decode the Fake Maps.
Why would anyone not be furious about the time and energy wasted on his Hoaxes?
And finally the Man himself is he Criminal, or has a Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) or just a bored trouble maker?
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks
An interesting question you pose Bill. As you pointed out, we can not KNOW what motivations Travis had. I will propose one more theory.
In the early days of Christianity, there were religious true believers, who felt there were not enough books/texts in the religion. So they would write up a book expounding on the religion, and instead of signing their own name, would write the name of some famous patriarch, saint or Apostle as the author. It is pretty much a certainty that Abraham did not write the Testament of Abraham for example. The experts call this "pious fraud" because it was not done with the intent to deceive anyone or defraud them of money or property, the real authors were trying to fill a gap they thought existed, making something they felt SHOULD exist.
I propose that Travis might have been making the maps to fill that gap, not to cheat anyone or fool them for laughs, but that he felt it SHOULD exist so created them. A simile would be the guy that gets to a crossroads and the road sign is missing, so he makes one to put in its place. Not an attempt to cheat or for laughs. Just a personal THEORY.
Joe - on the Bigfoot topic, I would suggest to look into it a bit deeper. The fakes are more easily detected these days, and the best tracks (as evidence) have real dermal ridges in them, like humans have as well as the great apes, but of a pattern unlike either species. You pointed out bears walking upright, yet bear tracks walking on two feet always look pigeon-toed, with the big toes in the wrong spots, also the stride is quite short because they can not take long steps without losing their balance. For those unfamiliar with what we are talking about, Joe as an old Alaskan sourdough is well familiar with bear tracks but some people have never seen them:
Bear track

<borrowed from this excellent site:
https://www.bear.org/website/bear-pages/black-bear/black-bear-sign/51-bear-tracks-and-trails.html>
This is an example of HUMAN dermal ridges just to show what dermal ridges are for those unaware:

Also a good photo of a track in snow on this page:
2013 November > Bigfoot Buzz > Page 2
Fingerprint examiner J.H.Chilcutt is credited with first identifying the bigfoot dermal ridge phenomenon.
As to the finding of remains, you are probably well aware of the argument about how often we find the carcass of dead bears, or a better example in dead mountain lions. Unless killed on a highway, it is very unlikely to find such a rare animal carcass. Nature itself removes the evidence. Also it is quite possible that we already have the remains, just perhaps not making the connection - the numerous "giants" skeletal remains found in burial mounds, caves etc in the US, and also the Gigantopithecus, which may have been a giant ape OR may have been a type of giant human. Humans have as many hairs as chimpanzees, it is entirely possible that another species of human may have had coarser hair, and would look just like what bigfoot are reported to look like.
It is a rather interesting topic, if you are interested I would love to discuss it with you, have a thread for that reason in another part of the forum.
Sorry for the off topic material. Please do continue;
