G
Gluk
Guest
i've decided to ignore af's excessively long, and inconclusively desperate posts.
af1733 said:Maybe you can ask you friend Jim to decipher them for you. You'll get two very different, very exciting stories, I'm sure.
Wow, man. I'm not sure if you or your friend Jim has more issues.Gluk said:af1733 said:Maybe you can ask you friend Jim to decipher them for you. You'll get two very different, very exciting stories, I'm sure.
inconclusively... inconclusively... 14 whole letters. Wow.
anyway, It's not like my friend has MPD (multiple personality disorder), he just acts differently while in public. he (not jim) is also an experienced dowser, but he normally looks at everything in a more scientific way. but when he's (jim) in public he tries to be more decisive and elaborate. (i assume this is because he doesn't want people to think he's retarded)
And I said:Gluk said:i've decided to ignore af's excessively long, and inconclusively desperate posts.
af1733 said:Maybe you can ask you friend Jim to decipher them for you. You'll get two very different, very exciting stories, I'm sure.
What fact are you referring to, Sandy? Is it in the mysterious missing study?Sandsted said:You sure change your story a lot Af. Many times before you've posted things like this, "If you want to present information that supports your argument, then it is up to you to find this proof." Proving that you won't find anything for yourself, now when faced with this fact you've changed to "I've looked for your study..."?
So, are you saying that you've never once stated that you can't take a test like Carl or Randi's because having a skeptic around makes it so you can't dowse?Sandsted said:"Nice tap dance." Af, why do you do this? When your dishonesty is proven, when your faced with the fact that you ignorantly lie about people...why do you bring yourself down the way you do? I "dared" (ooo, I must be a child!) you to support your statement and you can not because it was a lie from the start...so you just go back to insulting me, straying from subject, and attempt to lead people from noticing your fault?
He'd have to hide a Viking ship under a plate for you to take the test? Or would you have to locate an object that can't be dug up to prove your "ability"?Sandsted said:I'll take Carls test if Carl will come to my home, I am quite sure that when with such a person I would not be able to dowse, but perhaps it would work. I would not have the test be ten plates with gold in them...I don't dowse for gold.
Both very handy for you, I'm sure...Sandsted said:This is a dowsing forum, this ship I have dowsed, so I posted it...of course I'm not going to dig it up, it's in the middle of my drive way.
I just searched through my computer and I don't have pictures of my artifacts anymore since the computer was fixed and they've been deleated.
Okay Sandy, you asked for it. All these quotes were taken from your posts in this thread:Sandsted said:"Your excuse for the longest time is that having skeptics around usurps your dowsing ability."
This is quite simple Af, if I have said this...then quote it so that I know that I have. But I believe I haven't and if I'm right, then you are once again lying about me. What's the truth Af?
af1733 said:Okay Sandy, you asked for it. All these quotes were taken from your posts in this thread:Sandsted said:"Your excuse for the longest time is that having skeptics around usurps your dowsing ability."
This is quite simple Af, if I have said this...then quote it so that I know that I have. But I believe I haven't and if I'm right, then you are once again lying about me. What's the truth Af?
In response to these stupid challenges, I think it would be hard to work under a test, where someone is judging you, testing you. If you were near me I could teach you to dowse, I could show you things, but a test is hard.
But I can not pass the test, I don't think I could dowse correctly when under a test like that.
Anyway, to make it clear I really don't think I could dowse under the pressure of being tested by someone. I tried it once when I was first learning to dowse and it was really hard which I didn't expect and it hurt my confidence which then I couldn't dowse for a long time afterwards. I had to practice and work real hard for a long time to be able to do anything again.
I can dowse like this and have done it before, but under the circumstances of having someone so skeptical there and under the pressure of having to prove yourself to them…I just can’t dowse.
It's very easy to make mistakes with dowsing. If I were under the conditions of a test I wouldn't be able to dowse. I wouldn't call it a nervousness, but it is a lack of confidence due to my lack of experience.
Now...my problem is that...I find it very difficult to dowse under the conditions of having someone there that believes you’re lying, that believes this is all a fake and they strongly believe you are going to fail. I can't dowse like that. I also know that the minds of others around you can affect the dowsing.
Call me a liar again...![]()
Here's one post, Jeff, back on page 7, and there are a couple of other inferences as well,Sandsted said:You, Carl, Randi, and Trips do not fit into this category...it is the people like you that I find it impossible to dowse around. Skeptics are not a negative influence, people like yourself are...people that don't care to learn, people that have made premature conclusions that due to their attitudes will never change, people that instead of debating a subject sink to lying about people, insulting them, and make false accusations along with all of this. I would not even like to be around such people, much less dowse with them.
as well as lots of talk about false accusations on my part, but I really don't have any desire for you to remove the post, if that's okay.Sandsted said:This is quite simple Af, if I have said this...then quote it so that I know that I have. But I believe I haven't and if I'm right, then you are once again lying about me. What's the truth Af?