What's new

1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

Jaichim24

Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
317
Reaction score
603
Golden Thread
0
Location
CT
Detector(s) used
Minelab eTrac
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

So I visited a new site I just received permission to detect. It is an old cape dating back to the late 1700's. It's been converted to an office building and it's very close to a busy road, but there's a decent chunk of grass left in the front and back.

I started in the back near an old tree. That is where I found the silver thimble and the war nickel.

I moved around front and started gridding. It was rough going, I was digging every non-iron signal, and with it's proximity to the road I was digging tons of trash.

My efforts were rewarded with the 1882 IH. Also in the front just near the corner of the house I found the cool GW bicentenial token. My heart did skip a beat as I flipped up the dirt and saw it roll out. It landed on the side that still has the gold gild and for a brief moment I thought I had found a HUGE gold coin! It's still a pretty cool token, gotta love the up and down nature of metal detecting!

My gridding led me to one side of the side of the house (the other side being a parking lot with no grass), which basically saved the best for last. Every site always seems to have that one sweet spot where the soil has been disturbed the least. Well this was it. In the last hour of detecting I pulled out all of the buttons in the pictures, the really sweet 1864 IH penny.

So, the Guatemala button is probably the best preserved gold gilded button I've ever found. I always see people posting some real shiners and always wondered how that was possible. Well after a few seconds with a tooth brush and some aluminum jelly I had my 1800's "bling". The back mark dates to 1865-1902, and I'm wondering if this isn't a 50th year anniversary button for the liberation of Guatemala. So perhaps dating it to 1871 would be a fair assessment? Anyone else have an idea as to the date?

Lastly, I would love some feedback about the 1864 IH, could it possibly be the "L" variation? I think it is too worn to read the L, does anyone see it? I know that the L version had a variation to the chin area of lady liberty, does mine look like it? I have been staring at it and the 1882 for so long I'm starting to see things. It looks like mine is slighly thinner, but I am not certain. Let me know what you think.

Thanks for looking,

Jai
 

Attachments

  • 100_1598.webp
    100_1598.webp
    64.6 KB · Views: 371
  • 100_1601.webp
    100_1601.webp
    90.7 KB · Views: 374
  • 100_1602.webp
    100_1602.webp
    40.4 KB · Views: 371
  • 100_1608.webp
    100_1608.webp
    94 KB · Views: 359
  • 100_1609.webp
    100_1609.webp
    88.7 KB · Views: 368
  • 100_1614.webp
    100_1614.webp
    126.7 KB · Views: 358
  • 100_1625.webp
    100_1625.webp
    129.5 KB · Views: 360
  • 100_1618.webp
    100_1618.webp
    97 KB · Views: 354
  • 100_1628.webp
    100_1628.webp
    64.5 KB · Views: 350
Upvote 0
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH & GW bicentenial token

Very cool mix of finds, I would call that a successful hunt!!! Have to hit that again!
Thanks for posting,
HH
Bunker
 
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

I posted the 1864IH in the What is this forum, but here are a couple pictures I found that may help determine if it is a L version or not. The last picture does not include my IH, but is a picture someone else posted. Thanks for looking!

Jai
 

Attachments

  • 1864L_cent_obv_1.webp
    1864L_cent_obv_1.webp
    27.5 KB · Views: 281
  • 1864-indian-head-cent-Lcloseup.webp
    1864-indian-head-cent-Lcloseup.webp
    45.5 KB · Views: 312
  • 1864L_cent_obv.webp
    1864L_cent_obv.webp
    41.8 KB · Views: 315
  • 1864L_cent_closeup.webp
    1864L_cent_closeup.webp
    14.5 KB · Views: 329
  • 1864L_cent_obv_1.webp
    1864L_cent_obv_1.webp
    27.5 KB · Views: 293
  • 1864-indian-head-cent-Lcloseup.webp
    1864-indian-head-cent-Lcloseup.webp
    45.5 KB · Views: 323
  • 1864L_cent_obv.webp
    1864L_cent_obv.webp
    41.8 KB · Views: 319
  • 1864L_cent_closeup.webp
    1864L_cent_closeup.webp
    14.5 KB · Views: 320
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

Search my posts, I have an l and a regular posted in one of them, the pictures are taking forever to load on my phone. The l has the pointed bust, non l is rounded, if I'm remembering right..
 
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

sweet finds.
 
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

Thanks for the tip on looking at your posts. I've been comparing back and forth, and I believe mine more closely resembles the L version than it does the non-L.

Mine definately is pointy, but it has a slight curve to it at the bottom which had me thinking perhaps not L, but then if you notice the beads on the necklace, the beads in your pointing one, there is that one that sticks out past the next. (where as the non-L one, you do not see that "dot" after the neck.

Also, I zoomed in on my pic, just about to the size of the other zoomed in pic of an actual L sample, and I really think I can see the top two "dots" of the L.

So, more valuable L version everyone?

I've posted his pics with mine for comparison. The first one is the non-L, the second one is the L, and the third one is mine.
 

Attachments

  • 100_1609.webp
    100_1609.webp
    88.7 KB · Views: 276
  • P1010103.webp
    P1010103.webp
    32.9 KB · Views: 284
  • P1010102.webp
    P1010102.webp
    35.8 KB · Views: 261
  • 100_1609.webp
    100_1609.webp
    88.7 KB · Views: 274
  • MFD1964LcroppedonL.webp
    MFD1964LcroppedonL.webp
    2.3 KB · Views: 225
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

Nice finds!!! :icon_thumleft:
 
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

nice finds your dirt is very nice to them coins
 
Re: 1st 6.5 hours at new site 1864 IH (L ??) & GW bicentenial token

Thanks, most times the coins here on the East Coast can get pretty green and cruddy. Every so often you get a nice green patina and perfectly preserved details. Even more rarely one or two sides will be more brown patina than green which is what happend on the 1864. As I mentioned the gold button was the best I have ever found, most often 3/4 of the gilt is corroded off. I think it has more to do with the soil at this site. I'm still pretty excited about the finds.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom