A GUIDE TO VAULT TREASURE HUNTING (Condensed)

[Treasure Auras]

Apparently not far fetched at all. Plus, the area where I was at, was pretty much granite mountains/boulders, near water.

Remember they made storages in many places that they did Not mine, they liked places that they could easily find when coming back, this is why I always said a place like Victorio Peak was a perfect depository as it is a mountain peak all by itself.

 

[Treasure Auras]

You're absolutely right. Awesome pics by the way.

I used to give everybody a lot of leeway when it came to thinking if a marker is natural or not, but way to many really good markers have been posted and proven with many pictures the markers such as the heart are used repeatedly at multiple different sites across the country, so there really is no excuse anymore to think they were all made by mother nature. (unless intentionally trying to deny the markers existence)

 

[Crosse De Sign]

Apparently not far fetched at all. Plus, the area where I was at, was pretty much granite mountains/boulders, near water.

Just curious, would that be the Ouachitas, or maybe the Wichitas? Everyone knows they traveled the Red R. quite
extensively, & that many artifacts have been plowed, & dug up from the period. But perhaps they had also followed
some other water sources, like the Canadian R., Arkansas R., or even others like the Little R. Nice pics, thanks for sharing!

 

[Bygolly]

I used to give everybody a lot of leeway when it came to thinking if a marker is natural or not, but way to many really good markers have been posted and as has been proven with many pictures the markers such as the heart are used repeatedly at multiple different sites across the country, so there really is no excuse anymore to think they were all made by mother nature. (unless intentionally trying to deny the markers existence)

I agree. With all of the many many markers posted, the people who still deny the existence of man made markers, and continue to push the narrative that its all made by nature, do so for 2 reasons. Either they have some form of reverse pareidolia, and try to find so many reasons/explanations to Not see the patterns... Or they are deliberately denying their existence to deceive and/or dissuade any potential future pursuits or interest in the subject. IMO.

 

[Bygolly]

Just curious, would that be the Ouachitas, or maybe the Wichitas? Everyone knows they traveled the Red R. quite
extensively, & that many artifacts have been plowed, & dug up from the period. But perhaps they had also followed
some other water sources, like the Canadian R., Arkansas R., or even others like the Little R. Nice pics, thanks for sharing!

It was in the Witchitas

 

[Treasure Auras]

I agree. With all of the many many markers posted, the people who still deny the existence of man made markers, and continue to push the narrative that its all made by nature, do so for 2 reasons. Either they have some form of reverse pareidolia, and try to find so many reasons/explanations to Not see the patterns... Or they are deliberately denying their existence to deceive and/or dissuade any potential future pursuits or interest in the subject. IMO.

If you find a Skull there will be treasure buried in the nearby hills. I believe the problem is people only see one marker and make a decision off that single one unlike someone like me who has seen the same types of markers at multiple sites dozens of times. (the more markers you see especially markers in the shape of a Turtle or Eagle etc.) it just becomes undeniable at some point that they are man made.

 

[Crosse De Sign]

I was looking for a skull pic & ran across... Remember this one sandy1...

 

[Carl-NC]

I guarantee you will find some idiot to say those are natural

If you took all the photos you have of funny-looking rocks and showed them to a bunch of degreed geologists, would you then call them all idiots?

With all of the many many markers posted, the people who still deny the existence of man made markers, and continue to push the narrative that its all made by nature, do so for 2 reasons. Either they have some form of reverse pareidolia, and try to find so many reasons/explanations to Not see the patterns... Or they are deliberately denying their existence to deceive and/or dissuade any potential future pursuits or interest in the subject. IMO.

Personally, I don't deny that man-made markers exist, I just see remarkably few of them posted here. And with all those funny-looking rock pictures, sure, I see the shapes. What I don't see is evidence of being man-made, or of being a treasure marker. So for the vast majority of funny-looking rocks posted here there is, of course, at least a third option: the skeptic is right. To determine whether this is true simply requires a look at the evidence.

First, funny-looking rocks are ubiquitous world-wide; you can find them on every continent, even Antarctica once the ice sheet melts. I've done a lot of hiking in Oregon, Washington, and even British Columbia and I see funny-looking rocks (even a couple of hearts) most everywhere I go. Did the Jesuits and Spanish bury treasure vaults all over the world? Or did nature make funny-looking rocks pert-near everywhere?

Second, all of the funny-looking rocks posted here has so far led to zero treasure recoveries. As far as I can tell, the sum total is zero of anything at all, not even a decent relic. And everyone here seems to understand that's the nature of the game: find funny-looking rocks, do some exercises in geometry, take a bunch of photos until one shows a glitch, and then call it a day and go home. Post pictures on a forum that show you're a treasure hunter. Heck, everyone's so convinced of the outcome it's hard to even get a photo of a hole that's been dug. (I give Cyzak big kudos for pics of a very impressive hole; now that's conviction!)

Finally, since natural funny-looking rocks are not hard to find, it would make a whole lot more sense to pick one as a marker and bury the treasure nearby rather than going to all the work of carving a rock (or, in some of the cases posted here, a whole mountain). Plus, I've yet to see a chisel mark on these rocks.

So, am I trying to "dissuade any potential future pursuits or interest in the subject?" Not really, more so trying to inject some reality. The funny thing is, one of these funny-looking rocks could be a treasure marker, but when all funny-looking rocks become treasure markers the odds of figuring anything out become vanishingly small. On the bright side, you get some good exercise and, if you were to dig a bunch of holes, the blind squirrel analogy just might kick in. I will say that I would dissuade people from pursuing treasure auras -- that's just pure fiction. Show me the physics behind treasure auras, and explain why no major company is developing an aura detector. Or, show those treasure auras to a bunch of physicists, and then call them all idiots.

 

[Treasure Auras]

 

[Crosse De Sign]

View attachment 2264963

The big difference is: The "geologists" aren't knowledgeable enough to do what you have studied & learned how to do...

 

[Crosse De Sign]

Turtle in back, Heart in front, or the near side. Light & shadow Duck Head with the combination, & the Turtle Shell casting the Omega shadow on Turtle Head, from this angle, at this time of day & time of year...
Part of an alignment, in very close proximity (about 100' or so) to where I unexpectedly caught an aura on my old Samsung cell pone while taking a few pics.

 

[sdcfia]

Remember they made storages in many places that they did Not mine, they liked places that they could easily find when coming back, this is why I always said a place like Victorio Peak was a perfect depository as it is a mountain peak all by itself.

Begs the question - why haven't "the Catholics" retrieved all that AZ loot?

Correction: the NM ancient caches were/are in the Caballo Range, a cave-riddled limestone mountain on the Rio Grande which was navigable all the way from the Gulf of Mexico in olden days. Noss found some values in the Caballos, then created a red herring at Victorio Peak, which he then used to swindle investors until one of them killed him in the late 1940s. Your government later used Noss's "Victorio Peak discovery" as a very convenient money laundering scheme with which to dispose of their WWII plunder of German gold in Europe. It became "abandoned Spanish gold on US Government property - it's ours". Slick and clean, eh?

 

[sdcfia]

If you find a Skull there will be treasure buried in the nearby hills. I believe the problem is people only see one marker and make a decision off that single one unlike someone like me who has seen the same types of markers at multiple sites dozens of times. (the more markers you see especially markers in the shape of a Turtle or Eagle etc.) it just becomes undeniable at some point that they are man made.

Yes, there are plenty of man made treasure clues in multiple places. Most are associated with the famous KGC, which was originally hiding outlaw loot after the Civil War. When those caches' security were compromised in the early 20th Century, these folks reorganized and began relocating many caches to safer locations ca 1930s. Then they fabricated numerous "treasure legends" and manufactured those clues and signs that people have been finding, especially since about 1980. Your pal Kenworthy knew all about it. So, you're right - the markers are "real", but they don't lead the searcher to the right place, just in circles. This parent organization is likely aligned with the "deep state", "shadow government" or whatever you want to call them. The "sentinels"? ha ha

 

[Bygolly]

If you find a Skull there will be treasure buried in the nearby hills. I believe the problem is people only see one marker and make a decision off that single one unlike someone like me who has seen the same types of markers at multiple sites dozens of times. (the more markers you see especially markers in the shape of a Turtle or Eagle etc.) it just becomes undeniable at some point that they are man made.

Since you mentioned skulls, here's a large and quite obvious one (to me at least), that is relatively close to the first heart pic in NM I shared. Not sure what the boulder to the left of it is though. Someone else else on here might have a better idea about that than me.

 

[sdcfia]

View attachment 2264982

Since you mentioned skulls, here's a large and quite obvious one (to me at least), that is relatively close to the first heart pic in NM I shared. Not sure what the boulder to the left of it is though. Someone else else on here might have a better idea about that than me.

What part of NM are you in? Your terrain looks familiar, but half the state could qualify I guess. Here's a NM skull. It's a rock that was wedged between two limbs in a large pinon. As the tree aged, the rock got locked tight and became immovable. Whaddaya do with it? You could follow a line in the direction it's looking, down and to the right. You could map its coordinates and see if it might be a node in a pattern with other things. It could just be something put there by a jokester. Interestingly, a local young woman found a helmet and breastplate in a nearby (1/4 mile or less) limestone cave back in the 1950s.

 

[Carl-NC]

Maybe some of the folks who have followed your advice for years and have found absolutely nothing.

 

[Fordtrucksrule]

Maybe some of the folks who have followed your advice for years and have found absolutely nothing.

Deleting my rude message to avoid a ban....

 

[Bygolly]

What part of NM are you in? Your terrain looks familiar, but half the state could qualify I guess. Here's a NM skull. It's a rock that was wedged between two limbs in a large pinon. As the tree aged, the rock got locked tight and became immovable. Whaddaya do with it? You could follow a line in the direction it's looking, down and to the right. You could map its coordinates and see if it might be a node in a pattern with other things. It could just be something put there by a jokester. Interestingly, a local young woman found a helmet and breastplate in a nearby (1/4 mile or less) limestone cave back in the 1950s.
View attachment 2265003

I travel quite a bit, so im not "in" any part of NM

 

[Treasure Auras]

Why do you even come on here?

It always amazes when a person comes on a Treasure Hunting Website just to Tell Everybody Not to Believe in Auras or Pre 1800's Markers or even Buried Catholic Treasures.

 

[Mattock]

Why do you even come on here? Your nothing but an annoying ass old man. There is no one on here thats will show you shit because your an annoying ass old man. Please dissappear into another thread and dont come back

It’s obvious FTR. This is the only thread that anybody pays attention to him.