Abandoned House? OK To Metal Detect?

If this were the attitude of all detectorists, detecting would be quickly outlawed EVERYWHERE! TTC

Odd, but this Just assumes the person is doing something illegal (or downright horrible), in the first place. Then if this is true (that it would lead to laws), then what's wrong with the laws that already apply? If md'rs were already afoul of laws (& of such caliber that lawyers jump out of bushes) , then , seems to me those md'rs are already guilty.

If the all-fired offense were walking one's dog down said-path, do you think think a move might be afoot to make dog-walking illegal?

Not saying to throw caution to the wind. But just saying it's possible to over-think some scenarios of low-key-innocuous.
 

Last edited:
Knock on the neighbors door and see who owns it. If no one knows swing away! I would at least :laughing:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Hmm, something I didn't see mentioned. As the OP knows about this place, who else might also. You never know who you might bump into when you go bouncing over to the place, without permission. Trespassing could be the least of your worries. Up in my farm in PA, there are still folks who cook mash, and they can be downright ornery if you stumble into their spots.

And those folks can be the least of your troubles. Stumble into an abandoned house that someone is using to cook meth and who knows what could happen. Just because it looks abandoned doesn't mean it is.
 

Odd, but this Just assumes the person is doing something illegal (or downright horrible), in the first place. Then if this is true (that it would lead to laws), then what's wrong with the laws that already apply? If md'rs were already afoul of laws (& of such caliber that lawyers jump out of bushes) , then , seems to me those md'rs are already guilty.

If the all-fired offense were walking one's dog down said-path, do you think think a move might be afoot to make dog-walking illegal?

Not saying to throw caution to the wind. But just saying it's possible to over-think some scenarios of low-key-innocuous.
How ya doin' Tom? The subject is beat to death too many times here on The Net. Yet, the subject is not dog-walking or detecting or even trespassing. The subject is whether or not someone will respect another's person or property. My (late) brother owned a very nice home on a golf course (The Squires north of Milwaukee). His property line actually was 14 feet into the 5th fairway. He was a member of that particular club. He had no problem with golfers going around the dense hedgerow he had there to retrieve their ball. Some of the "turds" would actually play the ball on his lawn! Leaving a divot on a manicured lawn and playing through! No, the beef is not with the "trespasser", it is with those that "leave their mark" that causes laws to be written against detectorists. The part of Pa-dirt's post that I should have quoted is, "Otherwise, I would pass. Too much work." Too much work to ask permission? TTC
 

Last edited:
... The subject is whether or not someone will respect another's person or property....

Why yes, .... as a matter of fact, .... I find metal detecting to be VERY "respectful" of other people's properties. :laughing7:

It's the highest form of honor I can render to another person's property, to find it o be a hunt-worthy-site :headbang:

... it is with those that "leave their mark" that causes laws to be written against detectorists. ....


Sure. Then we leave no trace (marks), and presto, that base is covered , eh ?

Seriously now , I do see the mental image you put on this. To compare it to someone's yard . Like your brother's property that blended into a golf course, so people (gasp) stepped into his grass to fetch their golf balls. And as you can see in that case, even he wouldn't bat an eye, as it's a non-issue. But then factor on top of that, someone who's not even living there (as opposed to your brother who was), and in-the-middle of nowhere , in which trails are used by the public.... and ... well ... you get the picture.

Like when I was a kid, we used to use short-cut trails to school across vacant lots. Now in retrospect, those vacant lots were owned by someone. They eventually got built on, as houses continued to spring up around our neighborhood. But it was simply a non-issue.

Sure, a front yard of someone's home is another issue. And sure, the notion of "metal detecting" (or picking up a golf ball, verses actual golfing) is another issue.
 

Why yes, .... as a matter of fact, .... I find metal detecting to be VERY "respectful" of other people's properties. :laughing7:

It's the highest form of honor I can render to another person's property, to find it o be a hunt-worthy-site :headbang:




Sure. Then we leave no trace (marks), and presto, that base is covered , eh ?

Seriously now , I do see the mental image you put on this. To compare it to someone's yard . Like your brother's property that blended into a golf course, so people (gasp) stepped into his grass to fetch their golf balls. And as you can see in that case, even he wouldn't bat an eye, as it's a non-issue. But then factor on top of that, someone who's not even living there (as opposed to your brother who was), and in-the-middle of nowhere , in which trails are used by the public.... and ... well ... you get the picture.

Like when I was a kid, we used to use short-cut trails to school across vacant lots. Now in retrospect, those vacant lots were owned by someone. They eventually got built on, as houses continued to spring up around our neighborhood. But it was simply a non-issue.

Sure, a front yard of someone's home is another issue. And sure, the notion of "metal detecting" (or picking up a golf ball, verses actual golfing) is another issue.
(GOOD debate does cause some to think.....) I don't think we are talking here about respectful detecting. One of the recurring themes of your posts is, "Shut up and just stop drawing attention to our hobby by asking so many "attention drawing" questions." Well, unfortunately, too many just keep right on "testing" the waters by pushing the "powers to be" into action. When a county's board gets together to make laws, they hold a public input session. They don't hear from the millions of respectful detectorists at the meeting, they hear from the one landowner with the divots in the front yard. That is how these ridiculous laws get made. And money (still) talks. What is the motive for those that post threads about obscure spots, 10 miles from a road, with no current residents, and no close neighbors? It is to probably to justify doing something "innocuous" that they got "burned" on and need to spout to rile like-minded. TTC
 

(GOOD debate does cause some to think.....) ..... One of the recurring themes of your posts is, "Shut up and just stop drawing attention to our hobby by asking so many "attention drawing" questions." Well, unfortunately, too many just keep right on "testing" the waters by pushing the "powers to be" into action. ...

Terry, good topic.

Re.: the above quote. I normally cite the "swatting hornet's nests" notion for public land. Not private land (as is the case of the OP here) . But anyhow .....

In-so-far as it concerns the Private property issue (assuming utterly innocuous, as painted here), you are painting a picture of someone getting riled up about this. And that they therefore trot down to city hall to suggest a "no md'ing anywhere" law. If this premise is true, then sure: Everything else you're saying logically follows.

But I just can't imagine this happening. I mean, the VERY PREMISE of this O.P. is "out in the middle of nowhere". With "trail that goes right by it", etc.... Hence I just don't envision a landowner (of the place he hasn't put a penny's effort into for over 10 yrs. ) is waiting there behind a bush to "hate md'rs". I mean, sure, anything's possible.

But what I'm envisioning is someone beating their brains out to never get a reply, and thus preclude himself from a good spot. I'll give an example on the legal section, that bears repeating. Look for it on that forum section.
 

It's the highest form of honor I can render to another person's property, to find it o be a hunt-worthy-site :headbang:

:laughing7: I agree! I never give those modern McMansions a second look, but if I see a humble 1700's Georgian, I will always be fantasizing about being able to metal detect there. If someone came to my door asking to metal detect I would probably decline, but out of wanting to finally hunt the place out myself :laughing7:, then I would sit and talk about metal detecting stories for a little while (which always happens when I meet another metal detectorist). In the fall I talked for an hour with someone who came out of the woods with his metal detector happily announcing to me that he found a trash pile after I asked I told him I also detected. I never mentioned to him that I already did a clean search of that trash pit a year before, the 1803 cent I use as my avatar was within 20 feet of the trash pit, hopefully he managed to later find something great there (and finally be able to find bottles from the deep part of the trash pit, which I wasn't able to do.)
 

Terry, good topic.

Re.: the above quote. I normally cite the "swatting hornet's nests" notion for public land. Not private land (as is the case of the OP here) . But anyhow .....

In-so-far as it concerns the Private property issue (assuming utterly innocuous, as painted here), you are painting a picture of someone getting riled up about this. And that they therefore trot down to city hall to suggest a "no md'ing anywhere" law. If this premise is true, then sure: Everything else you're saying logically follows.

But I just can't imagine this happening. I mean, the VERY PREMISE of this O.P. is "out in the middle of nowhere". With "trail that goes right by it", etc.... Hence I just don't envision a landowner (of the place he hasn't put a penny's effort into for over 10 yrs. ) is waiting there behind a bush to "hate md'rs". I mean, sure, anything's possible.

But what I'm envisioning is someone beating their brains out to never get a reply, and thus preclude himself from a good spot. I'll give an example on the legal section, that bears repeating. Look for it on that forum section.
There is no simple solution here to a complex problem. The bandying back and forth will continue. Each "side" will push its agenda until hell freezes over yet the problem will remain. Time and effort spent gathering support for one's platform would be better spent digging(pun intended) into the goobly-gook mountain of ridiculous written law available rather than depending on "jackleg" lawyers here. TTC
 

I am good and honest, and pay state and federal income taxes on all buried treasures that I will find. So, I am not planning in going to HELL.
 

I am good and honest, and pay state and federal income taxes on all buried treasures that I will find. So, I am not planning in going to HELL.

Last year's income taxes for me.

$5- 20 colonial buttons
$2- A few crusty large cents and colonial coppers
$5- A few shoe buckles
$10- 15 or so musketballs
$1- A few clad quarters and zincolns.

I will probably get laughed at if I file income tax for my finds.
 

.... I will probably get laughed at if I file income tax for my finds.

Doesn't matter. It's still your obligation. What part of "law abiding" don't you understand ? Not only that, but we have your admission in print now. Tsk Tsk. It would be a shame if this fell into the hands of an IRS agent. But for a mere $100, I can be persuaded to keep quiet (I accept paypal).

As for me ? I never find anything of value ! :angel7:
 

Last year's income taxes for me.

$5- 20 colonial buttons
$2- A few crusty large cents and colonial coppers
$5- A few shoe buckles
$10- 15 or so musketballs
$1- A few clad quarters and zincolns.

I will probably get laughed at if I file income tax for my finds.
10 to 15 dollars worth of LEAD musket balls? Did you first file a Notice of Intent (recoverable minerals requirement).... did you cordon off the recovery area per EPA environmental requirements? Mm? TTC
 

10 to 15 dollars worth of LEAD musket balls? Did you first file a Notice of Intent (recoverable minerals requirement).... did you cordon off the recovery area per EPA environmental requirements? Mm? TTC

Terry, you're not joking about lead ! There was an old town demolition site in my city about 12 or 13 yrs. ago. An eminent domain take-over by the city, in our blighted bad-side chinatown district. The city tore down some abandoned buildings, and were going to put a garden or something there. We got in their each night after the workers cut out at 5pm, and were having fun getting old cach coins, a few seateds, opium bottles etc....

I found out later than the inspectors found (gasp) lead there! So a big bruhaha developed over "lead contamination". They theorized that yesteryear people used lead in their canning of food containers, or some such nonsense. But I knew as an md'r that it was nothing more than typical lead that you WOULD FIND ANYWHERE. Lead was the 'plastic of yesteryear' after all.

The project spec's got all changed around, and the city decided to remove the top 5 ft. of soil, and re-fill with clean soil. The "contaminated" soil had to be trucked a few hundred miles away to a hazzard site landfill at great expense.

And I had to laugh thinking: If these environmental people had ANY IDEA how much lead is on the average beach (fishing sinkers) they would no doubt shut down every beach . haha
 

Last year's income taxes for me.

$5- 20 colonial buttons
$2- A few crusty large cents and colonial coppers
$5- A few shoe buckles
$10- 15 or so musketballs
$1- A few clad quarters and zincolns.

I will probably get laughed at if I file income tax for my finds.
The IRS are not worry about the small stuff, just the buried treasures worth a lot of money.
 

The IRS are not worry about the small stuff, just the buried treasures worth a lot of money.

Really ? Well since your name is "Honest" Samuel, let's put this assertion to the test:

We'll go ask an IRS agent: Do I need to report all my income ? Or only income that amounts to "a lot of money" ?

I'll bet you dollars to donuts that the answer is: All income.

Now if the question is "DO THEY REALLY CARE ?", then your assertion would be correct.
 

The IRS agents get pay a lot of money and they do not waste their time and efforts checking many pages of the single coins and jewels that we may find. They only after rich people like yourself and other treasure hunters who find thousands of dollars worth of treasures and do not report. Tom, do you report the small staff? Tom, Do you report the large of money that you received from treasure hunting? I want to know and so is the IRS.
 

.... Tom, do you report the small staff? ....


The issue is not whether you, or I, or any other md'r "report small stuff". The issue is: Is it required ? The answer is "Yes it's required". As to whether anyone does it, the answer is "no".

Thus this is one of those things that there becomes a distinction between "what does the law say?" versus "does anyone really care or enforce or abide by ?". And by going and asking "do you care?" or "must I pay ?" the answer will not jive with real life .
 

Terry, you're not joking about lead ! There was an old town demolition site in my city about 12 or 13 yrs. ago. An eminent domain take-over by the city, in our blighted bad-side chinatown district. The city tore down some abandoned buildings, and were going to put a garden or something there. We got in their each night after the workers cut out at 5pm, and were having fun getting old cach coins, a few seateds, opium bottles etc....

I found out later than the inspectors found (gasp) lead there! So a big bruhaha developed over "lead contamination". They theorized that yesteryear people used lead in their canning of food containers, or some such nonsense. But I knew as an md'r that it was nothing more than typical lead that you WOULD FIND ANYWHERE. Lead was the 'plastic of yesteryear' after all.

The project spec's got all changed around, and the city decided to remove the top 5 ft. of soil, and re-fill with clean soil. The "contaminated" soil had to be trucked a few hundred miles away to a hazzard site landfill at great expense.

And I had to laugh thinking: If these environmental people had ANY IDEA how much lead is on the average beach (fishing sinkers) they would no doubt shut down every beach . haha
The EPA's requirement to scrape is exactly why I got so much old and so little clad coinage off a certain lot. I posted years ago about the SW corner of Howard and Kinnikkinnic (?). Ultimately got 28 wheats, 4 sil dimes, 1 buff , 1 sil quarter, and ONE CLAD penny over the course of a summer. Research showed that corner to be a summer stop for a roving carnival. The top soil was pushed over into a back corner. I saw that one of the old buildings here in Murphys was raized! Got the research going but.... two feet of fill came in MUCH too soon! Pooh! I watch for such places. TTC
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom