If it sounds like BS, maybe it is...
I recommend checking out the source:
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
McCullough Foundation
@NicHulscher
Epidemiologist and Administrator at the McCullough Foundation (@mcculloughfund). Stay informed
"The McCullough Foundation is not considered credible by mainstream medical, scientific, or public health organizations.
Key Credibility Concerns
• Lack of Peer Review: Reports published or promoted by the foundation (such as self-published documents on autism and vaccines) typically bypass independent peer review, instead using open pre-print repositories or unverified platforms rather than established scientific journals.
• Misinformation and Debunked Claims: The foundation's outputs frequently recycle long-debunked anti-vaccine narratives and incorrect claims regarding COVID-19 treatments and vaccine safety, which directly contradict robust global scientific consensus.
• Controversial Leadership: The organization is headed by Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist who has a heavily documented history of spreading medical misinformation and whose past public claims have led to severe professional criticism, loss of board certifications, and legal actions regarding institutional affiliations.
• Association with Discredited Figures: Their publications and reports have involved or cited figures associated with retracted research and scientific fraud, including Andrew Wakefield."
- Geowizard
