- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,326
- Reaction score
- 207,560
- Golden Thread
- 1
- Location
- Eastern Ontario Canada
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Deus, Deus 2, Minelab 3030, E-Trac,
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
| Main Strengths | Highly efficient in acute emergencies, trauma care, complex surgeries, and managing severe infections. | Excels in preventive care, wellness optimization, and managing some chronic lifestyle conditions. |
Each have a place in one's well being I personally believe.
Preventive care isn't a well advised option under Allopathic Medicine.
Though it is high on the list for Trauma, surgeries, severe infections.
When only looking at one side and discount the other through the lack of experience is only putting the blind fold on and trying to see.
So to the ones that totally are one sided in the viewpoint have you actually tried the other option.
There are many controlled studies using alternatives that are not "Peer" reviewed.
The question is why would they in the first place because it might undermine what they have been instructed to believe.
Where do the quoted references get their main funding from? Pharmaceutical giants are the bread basket for many medical based universities.
Here is an example of proof of what I just stated:
Per Capita Investment: International higher education assessments show that Johns Hopkins pulls in nearly $250,000 in private corporate funding per professor, with the majority of those private industry funds originating from the pharmaceutical sector.
So ask yourself the question this why would a professor talk about or endorse an alternative anything when they know who is buttering their slice of bread.







