Shake n Flake
Jr. Member
- #1
Thread Owner
In reading the law it specifies "suction or vacuum dredging" which usually involves an engine, but what about non-powered dredging, where the water drop itself provides the power?
I'd do it in a new York minute-LL I just ran outta water for my black op and screw the environutz/bureauratz and them friggn' injun casinos too-John
JohnTerryC said:It has been awhile since I read the dredge definition but it is very clear... "suction" dredge does not require an engine to be included. It is my opinion that ANY form of suction would be prohibited due to its "destructive" nature. I do not believe it destroys fish habitat but hey, I didn't write the law.
TerryC said:Kuger,
No sir. Sorry. I do not believe that dredging destroys fish habitat. Dredging improves (trout) habitat. Besides, the amount of sediment disturbance caused our species will never come CLOSE to the amount of sediment disturbance caused by the spring run-off every year. Just my opinion, for what it's worth. TTC
Shake n Flake said:No surprise how the reason changes. I'd heard that dredging stirred up too much mercury.
PS The last PC mfg facility I built was bankrupt by this insanity and the above is NOT even 1/2 the BS of doing biz in kalif 
kuger said:Shake n Flake said:No surprise how the reason changes. I'd heard that dredging stirred up too much mercury.
Thats more,no the biggest crock of Bull%*,right there,any body that knows anything about mercury knows thats not true.Who else is taking mercury OUT??I took 15 pounds of lead and half a Mayo jar of Merc last year

Hear no evil--see no evil and don't know a dam thing
what have we been driven to
John