What was troubling? Several things. You write a lot about what happened around 500 years ago, but give no explanation how you know what happened 500 years ago. I live in a house next to the ruins of a house of that family; my wife is almost certainly descended from Moctezuma I (I use the current Spanish spelling, your spelling was used long ago among many others over the years) and her family has little knowledge of what happened 500 years ago. They don't even know exactly when the first local male descendant of the daughter of Moctezuma I was born. Only that he was already local cacique when Cortes came to Tlaxcala.
For example, you mention maybe 200 warriors were sacrificed. So, where did that number come from? That whole statement sounds like creative writing. Were there 200 bodies or skeletons there? Or, did someone engage in pure conjecture based on items found? Do you have any idea what sort of logistics would be involved in sacrificing 200 old ladies, not to mention 200 very strong and fast warriors? That sort of unfounded statement can cast real doubt on what might otherwise be based on reality.
Second, I added very specific comments. When I looked them over, you edited key postings, leaving my comments high and dry. That is also off-putting.
So, my own conclusion is your posting is too unreal to be, er, real. I am not saying you have not found something important. Nor am I saying you have not found the treasure. I am saying adding unfounded details cast doubts on the whole tale. If the location and materials found by that man are real, you have done yourself needless harm by adding unfounded details.
I suggest in the future if you write about this, be VERY careful to distinguish things you find, and your interpretations of them. If you find 200 bodies, and think maybe they were sacrificed warriors, tell us you found 200 bodies, and why you think they were sacrificed warriors. If you find 200 cloaks, tell us that. Do not tell us they belonged to 200 sacrificed warriors unless you have a very solid reason to know there were 200 sacrificed warriors. Tell us why you think there were 200 sacrificed warriors involved. Etcetera,
For example, you mention maybe 200 warriors were sacrificed. So, where did that number come from? That whole statement sounds like creative writing. Were there 200 bodies or skeletons there? Or, did someone engage in pure conjecture based on items found? Do you have any idea what sort of logistics would be involved in sacrificing 200 old ladies, not to mention 200 very strong and fast warriors? That sort of unfounded statement can cast real doubt on what might otherwise be based on reality.
Second, I added very specific comments. When I looked them over, you edited key postings, leaving my comments high and dry. That is also off-putting.
So, my own conclusion is your posting is too unreal to be, er, real. I am not saying you have not found something important. Nor am I saying you have not found the treasure. I am saying adding unfounded details cast doubts on the whole tale. If the location and materials found by that man are real, you have done yourself needless harm by adding unfounded details.
I suggest in the future if you write about this, be VERY careful to distinguish things you find, and your interpretations of them. If you find 200 bodies, and think maybe they were sacrificed warriors, tell us you found 200 bodies, and why you think they were sacrificed warriors. If you find 200 cloaks, tell us that. Do not tell us they belonged to 200 sacrificed warriors unless you have a very solid reason to know there were 200 sacrificed warriors. Tell us why you think there were 200 sacrificed warriors involved. Etcetera,