What's new

Can anyone figure out who this is

jtw1313

Silver Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
2,099
Golden Thread
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
It's a portrait of James Armstrong, taken in 1817, at Gettysburg, PA. :laughing7:
 
Upvote 0
It looks like it could be a relative of Louis Armstrong too. 8-)
 
Upvote 0
Used to do this as a kid in school. Think your portrait could be underneath or gone.
 
Upvote 0
It's a "shadow portrait".


These were popular as an inexpensive alternative to a painted portrait before photography came in to common use in the mid 1800's.


I also remember making these in grade school in the 60's (that's the 1960's...). We used a bright light to project our shadow on the paper and someone else traced the silhouette.


Early ones were painted or cut free-hand with scissors.
 
Upvote 0
It's a "shadow portrait".


These were popular as an inexpensive alternative to a painted portrait before photography came in to common use in the mid 1800's.


I also remember making these in grade school in the 60's (that's the 1960's...). We used a bright light to project our shadow on the paper and someone else traced the silhouette.


Early ones were painted or cut free-hand with scissors.

That's exactly what I thought too and that it really looked like it could be a relative of Louis Armstrong from that profile... 8-)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
My first thought was Alfred Hitchcock.
 

Attachments

  • alfred2.webp
    alfred2.webp
    3.8 KB · Views: 132
Upvote 0
My first thought was Alfred Hitchcock.

Too funny. He was my first thought too but as I studied it more and with the name Armstrong, it reminded me more of a younger and thinner Satchmo.
 
Upvote 0

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom