BigCypressHunter wrote:
> I PMed CBG to help us date this button.
There has to be a reason why none of the "old-time button" experts mentioned by BCH have posted in this discussion. I of course cannot speak for the others, only for myself. I've gotten very frustrated with posters who come to the What-Is-It forum wanting relic ID help but do not bother to read PBK's up-top post titled "Please read before posting items in What-Is-It." The poster of the (apparently) Belgian-shield button doesn't tell us what country it was found in, nor what part of the country. (Also, his Profile does not tell us where he is located.) He has never bothered to give us a size-measurement of the button. The situation is made even worse when the help-requester won't answer important questions about the button. Quite a few posts back in this discussion, BigCypressHunter asked him several questions: "Is the loop the same metal as the button? Test with a magnet. Does it look as if the loop was soldered on or is it cast all in one piece?"
The finder of the button has posted since then, but hasn't bothered to answer those important questions for accurately identifying it and time-dating it.
So, the only answer I can give him is based on LACK of important information, due to his un-cooperativeness. Based on what can be seen in the photos, it appears to be not from the 1700s or 1800s -- it appears to be a worthless "Fashion" civilian-clothing button from the modern era, made of solid-cast cheap grey potmetal which had an equally cheap thin "gold-tone" finish. That is my analysis of his button until he decides to cooperate with this forum's rules ("Please read before posting"), AND he gets around to providing answers to BigCypressHunter's very important questions about the button. Also, the name of the country (and what part of the country) it was dug in. Knowing whether it was dug in the US, Britain, Belgium, Canada, Australia -- or someplace else -- IS important for accurately identifying it.