Assembler
Silver Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2017
- Messages
- 4,707
- Reaction score
- 2,557
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- Fisher AQ Pulse, Fisher water old detectors, Older Whites TRs.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #21
Thread Owner
I'm thinking the biggest difference with China set ups is both the size of antenna and the amount of power used. I'm wondering if a smaller system setup that can detect 100 - 200 feet would be more practical?
Similar technology has been used in my region too. The philosophy seemed to be to use the TDEM survey to generate better drill targets and it did generally work, but failed to discriminate between native silver and more conventional metallic sulfides. Given our mineralogy I'm curious as to whether the method would work, since our values are very closely associated with sulfides.
More on my side of things (I'm a miner, not a geologist/geophysicist, nor do I play one on TV), they drilled an unmapped stope while working to explore the original vein. This is why I'm such a strong proponent of physical entry and chip/grab sampling of old workings whenever safe to do so. Properly rehabilitated and maintained old workings can be a real asset.







