While no one could completely say that they have never been under an amputation process through a civil war surgeon. The science that a human can simply not make those marks is out there. Also - there is almost NO historical accounts of a doctor giving a patient a bullet to chew on during a process - there are however accounts of wooden rods and leather straps. The reason being, they are wider than the mouth and do not provide a choking hazard. The last thing a surgeon wanted to do was to pull a object (perfect enough to choke on) out of a patients mouth in the middle of an amputation. This is just common sense vs folklore.
I have also found modern (late 1800's rounds) with animal chew marks on them. There is a reason why known civil war relic experts and those of us who have spent hundreds and thousands of hours in the field recovering items refute the folk lore. I too once (when I began digging) thought they were all human chewed - years of experience have changed that.

There is no denying the fact that chewed (by human teeth) bullets exist. I have found a few. I don't know why. I do know this though, when I was a teenager, I just loved to bite down on the little lead "split shot" fishing weights when I attached them to my fishing line. Felt good in a weird way.![]()
creskol said:I think they were used as caltrops ..![]()
Do you have to bring that adventure back to us?
There have been many!
Yeah,A very interesting read. The debate goes on ( tho I go with the animal theory). And that Sweet taste of lead is what made so many small kids eat lead paint chips for years. Davers