newnan man
Gold Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 6,744
- Reaction score
- 26,077
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Beautiful Florida
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
Those are excellent points dats-ago!
Treasure Hunting:
The first shooting at a school in the US of A was well over 100 years ago. It's hardly a new problem.
Good luck to all,
The Old Bookaroo
Treasure Hunter:
How many more school shootings will it take before the clock strikes "Now?"
Good luck to all,
The Old Bookaroo
Tpmetal:
There isn't a "perceived" problem - there is a very real one. I already addressed the local gun law issue above.
The first thing we can do to work to solve the problem is to admit there is one. Then remove the obstacles to an intelligent study of the issues. Why is funding so difficult to obtain to do that? Why are so many people afraid of the answers? Do they not go to the doctor when they are sick because they fear the truth?
We can eliminate the exemption from product liability lawsuits for gun makers. What other industry enjoys such a blanket grant from the government? "Conservatives" argue the government shouldn't pick winners and losers. Product liability law is well-established. There's ample case law. If Sturm, Ruger produces a defective pistol, why shouldn't a victim of their negligence be able to sue them?
Happily, the Biden Administration isn't satisfied with the sorry status quo.
How one sentence (and $5 billion) could reshape America's approach to gun violence (yahoo.com)
Please note: There's nothing here about a "ban."
Good luck to all,
The Old Bookaroo
Treasure Hunter:
How many more school shootings will it take before the clock strikes "Now?"
Good luck to all,
The Old Bookaroo
Tpmetal:
There isn't a "perceived" problem - there is a very real one. I already addressed the local gun law issue above.
The first thing we can do to work to solve the problem is to admit there is one. Then remove the obstacles to an intelligent study of the issues. Why is funding so difficult to obtain to do that? Why are so many people afraid of the answers? Do they not go to the doctor when they are sick because they fear the truth?
We can eliminate the exemption from product liability lawsuits for gun makers. What other industry enjoys such a blanket grant from the government? "Conservatives" argue the government shouldn't pick winners and losers. Product liability law is well-established. There's ample case law. If Sturm, Ruger produces a defective pistol, why shouldn't a victim of their negligence be able to sue them?
Happily, the Biden Administration isn't satisfied with the sorry status quo.
How one sentence (and $5 billion) could reshape America's approach to gun violence (yahoo.com)
Please note: There's nothing here about a "ban."
Good luck to all,
The Old Bookaroo
There isn't a "perceived" problem - there is a very real one. I already addressed the local gun law issue above.
The first thing we can do to work to solve the problem is to admit there is one. Then remove the obstacles to an intelligent study of the issues. Why is funding so difficult to obtain to do that? Why are so many people afraid of the answers? Do they not go to the doctor when they are sick because they fear the truth?
We can eliminate the exemption from product liability lawsuits for gun makers. What other industry enjoys such a blanket grant from the government? "Conservatives" argue the government shouldn't pick winners and losers. Product liability law is well-established. There's ample case law. If Sturm, Ruger produces a defective pistol, why shouldn't a victim of their negligence be able to sue them?