What's new

dont know if it went on a stick or hand tool

CASPER-2

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2012
Messages
17,375
Reaction score
20,667
Golden Thread
1
Location
NEW ENGLAND
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
WHITE'S XLT, PI PRO, GARRETT 2500, 3- FISHER CZ21s, JW FISHER 8X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
found in a Ma.few yrs back in farm field where flakes are found and few points have been found
 

Attachments

  • indian artifact.webp
    indian artifact.webp
    46.9 KB · Views: 766
Upvote 0
Just curious, looks like a soapstone nugget, do you know what the material is?
 
round edge is actually worked - smaller end is actually smooth
like it was held at that end and possibly a hand tool
the stains on the smaller end actually looks like
it could be blood - stone is slightly porous - so this could be
 

Attachments

  • indian artifact2.webp
    indian artifact2.webp
    55.9 KB · Views: 617
smaller end - one side has a slight indentation that is very smooth
some staining - other side has more brownish red staining and is also smooth
I have big hands - but stone fits with small end between thumb and forefinger
comfortably - wondered if it could have been used to grind corn - found in colonial town corn field
if positioned with finger in smooth grove - could they have used this to nap?
second stone was found near by - out of ordinary so I picked up too
it has reddish brown staining on one end too
never noticed but it looks like something on other side
the point and pieces of points were found within 20 yards of these to stones
no other rocks near by - some flint flakes and small chips found around area too
I study geology for a few yrs - these just do not like naturally formed stones to me
look like some one used them for something
also found a home made spoon out of copper in same area - will take pics in someone wants
to see - dont know if it is something indian tried to make from copying a colonial one
the outside form is cut edges - which I dont know how they would have done
unless they borrowed some snips - but the bowl of spoon is what interested me
it was pound by something small many times to form
will find and take a pic
 

Attachments

  • DSC00172.webp
    DSC00172.webp
    63 KB · Views: 404
  • DSC00171.webp
    DSC00171.webp
    84.8 KB · Views: 412
  • DSC00169.webp
    DSC00169.webp
    82.2 KB · Views: 403
  • DSC00168.webp
    DSC00168.webp
    75.2 KB · Views: 411
  • DSC00167.webp
    DSC00167.webp
    52 KB · Views: 394
  • DSC00166.webp
    DSC00166.webp
    70.4 KB · Views: 329
  • DSC00165.webp
    DSC00165.webp
    47.5 KB · Views: 326
  • DSC00163.webp
    DSC00163.webp
    84.4 KB · Views: 325
  • DSC00162.webp
    DSC00162.webp
    49.1 KB · Views: 336
  • DSC00161.webp
    DSC00161.webp
    74.1 KB · Views: 336
  • DSC00160.webp
    DSC00160.webp
    76.8 KB · Views: 348
  • DSC00159.webp
    DSC00159.webp
    54.4 KB · Views: 344
this copper spoon was found within maybe ten yards from points and the 2 stones
was hand made - dont know if by an indian or colonists
 

Attachments

  • DSC00151.webp
    DSC00151.webp
    60 KB · Views: 338
  • DSC00149.webp
    DSC00149.webp
    67.6 KB · Views: 365
  • DSC00154 (2).webp
    DSC00154 (2).webp
    47.4 KB · Views: 335
Picture # DSC00168.JPG Looks like it could be a sinker, or a bolo! :thumbsup:
 
Casper, even with the new photos I still see nothing that makes me believe this was ever altered by man to make it an artifact. Your other stone looks natural as well.
 
the first pic is a knapstone....used to break the stone into smaller flakes and then bone and smaller tools were used to pressure flake the edges and round it off.
 
You couldn't ever tell if that was used unless you put it under a microscope and see if the "worked" area actually was worked. I agree though looks like a net weight or the like. Then again it also looks like a rock.
 
actually i looked at the first pics again that does seem to be a hammerstone and taking into account it was found in a productive field. First thing I do if I find a pc like that is to determine if there are more of the same material. If not I assume its a "carried to site" pc. to meet a specific task ie hammering or etc. That doesn't mean though that if there is a lot of the same materials that they didn't use what was laying around. But it would help make better assumptions on the pc in q.
 
SOHIO said:
You couldn't ever tell if that was used unless you put it under a microscope and see if the "worked" area actually was worked. I agree though looks like a net weight or the like. Then again it also looks like a rock.

or ive just seen a LOT of em... let me see if i can post some pics :icon_thumleft:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom