Found this today... SOLVED!!! 1798 sheldon 186 Thanks Don !!!

[bradgny]

Ok I figured out the scanner to take a better scan maybe someone can tweek it now to get the date. Picked up this old copper Im sure the first three numbers are 179 but the third number might be a 8 .the forth number can only be a 0 a 3 8 or a 9.I tryed to scan it ,the only thing coming out is the boston that is stamped in the coin and the bust and hair line ,If anyone can tweek the colors and make it clearer ,Please feel free to post a pic for me .there are bib differences in the value in those dates ,Ag maybe g4 i dont know
Thanks

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[Iron Patch]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

There is a listing in Brunk for the stamp Boston. If anyone has the book they will be able to add more, if not, I'll tell you in a week to 10 days.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

DR.ÖTEK Metal Detector, Waterproof Gold Detector, Pinpoint & Terrain Modes, Professional Metal Detector - Grab it through Amazon!

[bradgny]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

heres another view

 

[BuckleBoy]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

1798/7 Perhaps?

 

[Lowbatts]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

1798/7 Perhaps?

Looks like it to me.

 

[Woodland Detectors]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Well there are 3 of here and it looks like an "8" to us....nevertheless------------^ sweet!

 

[Lowbatts]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Yes, there is an 8 there, but note the diagonal through it and the top line that appears to be a 7 originally.

 

[Don in SJ]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Four of us

It's a 8, what is seen as a possible overdate does not exactly match the only possible variety of 1798/7 that it could be. There are 3 varieties, the first two the 8 touches the drapery, so that rules them out and the third variety the part of the 7 that shows is very small amount and would need a good condition date to tell, and I don't think that is possible on this coin.

A shame more details in the coin are not there, no reverse, no LIBERTY to compare and make certain ID, so, the only value I see in the coin is the beautiful countermark on it, THAT makes the coin a collectible, since the wear condition of the coin itself is not too good..........

Confused over your title, "no digging 1799" is the coin a metal detecting find from the ground or found otherwise?

Don

 

[dfx willy]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

could you use tin foil or do some kind of rub to make out the date? willy.

 

[crazyjarhead]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Very nice find. Never seen one like that before

 

[bradgny]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Here is a picture of the reverse .Also the last number is what appears to be an 8 but there is also signs of another number there .The 8 has what looks like a broken 9 not a 7 .I wish i could take better photos .Maybe wishful thinking but the last numbr is not just an 8

 

[curbdiggercarl57]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Great counter-stamped!

 

[fmerg]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

i think its a 1798 1/2 cent
the 1793 1/2 cent the bust was looking to the left
the 1798 the bust was looking to the right

 

[kdismuke1]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

SUPER COIN.

 

[bradgny]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Some people have asked if this is a dutg coin.It is not ,the coin was in a lot i purchased from an estate sale shop.The coins in the collection were great coins .The inventory list of the lot did include this coin .Its listed as a 1799 over 1798 counterstamp.This is why Im trying to figure if thats what it truly is .Holding the coin at a certian angle the last number appears to be an 8 but also has the widened end of the 9 on the bottom left .Going to take it to a coin shop and see if they can pick up what Im seeing wish me luck

 

[Don in SJ]

Finally, I am sure I have a positive ID

The coin is not a 1799, it is not a 1798 over a 7, but it is a 1798 Large Cent! I asked for a photo of the Reverse, thinking it anything showed, it is always possible it could provide a positive clue on the attribution. Well, yesterday I overlooked the obvious, but this morning the feature that ID'd the coin was staring me in the face.

The coin is a 1798 Sheldon 186. Die State 1 most likely (hard to say for certain with the severe wear on the Obverse.)

What was the identifying featured, the huge die crack on the Reverse side! That makes it a diagnostic positive ID.

Here is what is said in Walter Breen's book on Large Cents: Reverse Side:::

Instantly identifiable by the die crack from rim to rim through the final 0, wreath, and ME

There are 10 known die states, with varying amounts of die crack and different locations, but like I said above, it is most certainly a Die State 1 without enough detail left to say any other die state.

I'm attaching a link to one, it is a later state die crack, but shows how the main original die crack matches........

http://www.largecents.net/collection/coinpics/s186.jpg

Don

 

[bradgny]

Re: Found this today... no digging 1799 ? large cent New pics Help!!!

Wow !!!
Don thanks for the positive ID. I appreciate the time and effort you put in to do this .Always very nice feelng, that I can always count on someone here on TN to help me out .And to all the others trying to figure it out ,A big thank you to you all
Happy hunting

 

[bradgny]

The coin is now up for sale on feebay ,if anyone interested in it check it out

 

[PBK]

About the countermark...

Brunk's Merchant amd Privately Countermarked Coins (2003) indicates that over 30 examples of this "BOSTON" mark have been documented. Attribution is uncertain, but Brunk suggests that the mark may be that of the Boston Type and Stereotype Foundry, 1817-1892 or later.

Most of the host coins are large cents or half cents, but the same countermark has also been seen on a dime, half dollar, British halfpenny, Spanish 2 reales, Mexican 8 reales, and Italian 5 lire. Only one previously reported host coin is dated prior to 1800, the 2 reales (1797); the most recent host coin is the half dollar (1875).

Hartzog's Countermarked Coins Price Guide (published as a supplement to Brunk's book) values "BOSTON" countermarks at $20-30.

 

[Iron Patch]

About the countermark...

Brunk's Merchant amd Privately Countermarked Coins (2003) indicates that over 30 examples of this "BOSTON" mark have been documented. Attribution is uncertain, but Brunk suggests that the mark may be that of the Boston Type and Stereotype Foundry, 1817-1892 or later.

Most of the host coins are large cents or half cents, but the same countermark has also been seen on a dime, half dollar, British halfpenny, Spanish 2 reales, Mexican 8 reales, and Italian 5 lire. Only one previously reported host coin is dated prior to 1800, the 2 reales (1797); the most recent host coin is the half dollar (1875).

Hartzog's Countermarked Coins Price Guide (published as a supplement to Brunk's book) values "BOSTON" countermarks at $20-30.

You beat me to it, just got the book yesterday. Hard to find!!! A bit disappointed in the lack of British listings.

 

[Green1]

Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet !!!!!!!!! i's still be smiling !!