architecad said:
EE THr said:
You have the same problem with function generators that you have with LRLs in general: You have no way of knowing if they actually do what you claim or not.
And so you rely on #12, in the link below, as your response to
everthing.
But, in doing so, you have automatically become your own best "skeptic."
Negative. I never had problem with Function Generators and MFD. I used my MFD since 1992 with no problem. Always I found gold with it. Who has problem in this forum is you with your pretentious post. Remember kid, We don't have to show up any proof about our claims because is not necessary in this forum in order to participate. You and your friends want to see some proof because your business and I'm very sorry to please you. BTW, I don't have a MFD right now.
Arch
You have admitted on here that you have no idea of how a function generator works, yet you pretend that you do.
That's the definition of
pretentious.
And you still
alledge that you found gold with it. Yet you don't even know how to test for gold! If you did stumble across something yellow, you have no idea what it might be!
It is not necessary to prove yourself, in order to participate on the forum, but it is necessary if you want any respect. That's just the American way. You need to learn that, too.
No, I don't have any expectations of ever seeing any proof that LRLs or MFDs work, because they don't. I know that because if they did, some honest person would have provided real proof by now.
And, once again, why would metal detector makers fear something that has never worked, and never will? Maybe some day there might be something that does work, on the civilian market, but they won't call it an LRL or MFD, and it won't be based on the pseudoscience BS that the current ones are.
So once again you are posting pure #12, on the link below, and have proven only that you are still your own best "skeptic."
A Dozen Points Proving LRL Fraud These points have never been rationally refuted.
"The level of sanity or insanity of the subject matter, determines the level of sanity or insanity of the two-way communication attainable in any discussion."