PI detectors have long had some amount of iron ID when using a DD coil than can look at reactive signals during TX. The problem is that iron is not purely magnetic-reactive, it often has a resistive eddy component. And at depth, the eddy component may dominate the RX signal making deep iron look non-ferrous. Which is exactly what you get with both PI and VLF.The GPZ 8000 is designed to recognize IRON, a magnetic metal and exclude the Iron. Show me! Can the predecessors do that?
I was told that the eventual goal is to adopt BT LE Audio which is the new low-latency standard intended to replace AptX-LL. Chip vendors are still tying their shoes, mostly over licensing issues. However, I finally see LE Audio headphones showing up on Amazon. I have an LE Audio system running and latency is around 30ms, bout the same as AptX-LL. There is no wireless with zero latency, and anything less than 50-60ms is not perceptible.Unlike the older Wi-Stream, the new filings show a shift toward a proprietary low-latency 2.4GHz/Bluetooth hybrid module. This suggests the 8000 will finally ditch the WM12 module in favor of a direct-to-headset connection with zero lag—likely compatible with the ML105 or a newer "ML200" headset.
But with metal detectors, it is actually the best sense available. Human sound processing often fills in gaps and creates perceptions that aren't necessarily in the sound that was heard. This is a benefit with metal detecting because it creates an additional audio filter that helps pick out a faint target in the presence of noise that the detector electronics alone might miss. Plus it's faster than sight.The MOST unreliable sense humans have is "hearing".
You don't have to use the stereo audio if you don't want to. Use mono, and apply to either ear.A large segment of the population is hearing disabled
I’d love to hear from someone who’s heard the new 8000 audio and has also used Nenad’s SP01 with its pseudo stereo to see how they compared, any iof you have experience with both systems that can comment.PI detectors have long had some amount of iron ID when using a DD coil than can look at reactive signals during TX. The problem is that iron is not purely magnetic-reactive, it often has a resistive eddy component. And at depth, the eddy component may dominate the RX signal making deep iron look non-ferrous. Which is exactly what you get with both PI and VLF.
I was told that the eventual goal is to adopt BT LE Audio which is the new low-latency standard intended to replace AptX-LL. Chip vendors are still tying their shoes, mostly over licensing issues. However, I finally see LE Audio headphones showing up on Amazon. I have an LE Audio system running and latency is around 30ms, bout the same as AptX-LL. There is no wireless with zero latency, and anything less than 50-60ms is not perceptible.
But with metal detectors, it is actually the best sense available. Human sound processing often fills in gaps and creates perceptions that aren't necessarily in the sound that was heard. This is a benefit with metal detecting because it creates an additional audio filter that helps pick out a faint target in the presence of noise that the detector electronics alone might miss. Plus it's faster than sight.
You don't have to use the stereo audio if you don't want to. Use mono, and apply to either ear.
I don't understand your other comments. When I tested the 8k, I found the stereo audio to be a mess. But with time, it may be useful. As someone in the video said, "It's gonna take some getting used to." I have long been a proponent of stereo audio where the different signals get processed between the ears. The Naulitus was the first to do this, and the White's V3 did it better.

"Key Coil Options
- Geowizard
- Z18 (18-inch) Concentric Toroidal Coil: Engineered for maximum depth and coverage in open, highly mineralized ground.
- Z17 (17-inch) Concentric Toroidal Coil: Ideal for high EMI (electromagnetic interference) areas and conductive soils, providing stability and high sensitivity to small-to-medium gold.
- Z13 (13-inch) Concentric Toroidal Coil: Best for highly vegetated or rocky terrain, offering improved maneuverability, balance, and reduced user fatigue. "
Is this what us lay people consider the "halo" around a degrading target? All of us have had a target that initially sounded good, only to have it disappear or sound/read completely different after removing some of the surrounding ground matrix.PI detectors have long had some amount of iron ID when using a DD coil than can look at reactive signals during TX. The problem is that iron is not purely magnetic-reactive, it often has a resistive eddy component. And at depth, the eddy component may dominate the RX signal making deep iron look non-ferrous. Which is exactly what you get with both PI and VLF.

Cudamark,Is this what us lay people consider the "halo" around a degrading target? All of us have had a target that initially sounded good, only to have it disappear or sound/read completely different after removing some of the surrounding ground matrix.
Halo effect is different. Halo effect is when the eddies generated in a target spread out into the surrounding soil. This can be caused from the target itself leaching conductive ions or oxides into the soil, or because the soil was already conductive (like wet salt sand). This might explain why someone digs up a target 12" deep but in air it is only detected at 10".Is this what us lay people consider the "halo" around a degrading target? All of us have had a target that initially sounded good, only to have it disappear or sound/read completely different after removing some of the surrounding ground matrix.

That didn’t take long… 🤣 No wonder it’s taking forever to get coils, Minelab’s selling them all on Alibaba. 🤣