Help w/ identifying very large stone knife artifact found in Texas.

History Detective

Jr. Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
75
Reaction score
11
Golden Thread
0
Location
East Texas
Detector(s) used
Garrett Ace 250
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hi,
Can anyone please help identify this large, I am guessing stone knife? I found it on private property w/ the owners permission in San Marcos, Texas a while back but have always wondered if it had a classification name also approximate age.
Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • 025.webp
    025.webp
    416.2 KB · Views: 376
  • 029.webp
    029.webp
    352.5 KB · Views: 1,348
  • 031.webp
    031.webp
    248 KB · Views: 306
  • 030.webp
    030.webp
    295.7 KB · Views: 477
Upvote 0
That's a beauty, Nice Find! :icon_thumright:

I'm sure someone down in your area will help with a classification.
 
Hi, Thanks for the suggestion, believe it or not I took it to a local University professor and supposed artifact historian and he was not even really sure...???
 
Looks like archaic arrowhead to me. I've been looking on Overstreet online to try to see what type classifies this one best. It actually kind of reminds me of a Kirk Corner-Notch and a Hardin both. It doesn't quite have the expanded base like a Hardin does though.
 
Hey rockheadhunter, thanks so much for your work! That's what the professor told me about Archaic and also, San Marcos has some very, very early occupation by Native American Indians. In fact, some call it the oldest continuously inhabited site in the U.S. Sure wish I could get it nailed down...
 
I live in NC and as a soon as I saw that arrowhead in reminded me of a Kirk type. I have found Kirks here that are corner-notched, stemmed, bifuricated, and snapped base. Most I find are not as big or are re-sharpened a lot during use. Your looks to be in extremely fine shape, maybe a G8 or better grade. Those are really hard to come by. You know what the material is? Is it the Edwards Plateau flint/chert?
 
Hi rockheadhunter,
You might be right since you seem to have a lot of experience w/ these. As far as the material, geology is just not something I am good at...it could be what you say....thanks for your opinion in grade...I really don't know much about these things but I found it back in the early 1980's while someone was building a fence in their back yard which was very close to the San Marcos River...
 
One thing is for sure it ain't, and that's an arrowhead.

For now, from what I see in overstreets, I would type it a Marcos, and a real nice one.
 
Hi Quito,
Thanks for your input, I really appreciate it.
I googled Marcos point and I see where you are coming from...its very close if not spot on...I read a description on them and it does indeed seem to fit especially the size, and base notches...Is it solved then do you think? Also, where can I get the best info. on this type of point? Thanks!
 
Hi rockheadhunter,
What do you think about the possibility of it being a Marcos point as someone suggested?
 
I was looking on the online Overstreet and I was searching for the specific details that your point has. For example, it is corner-notched and it was found in the Gulf Coastal region. The points that came up that looks likes yours is the Kirk CN and Hardin. That's how I made my assumption. However, Marcos did not come up. I just looked up Marcos on the Overstreet online and there is such a point and it gives pictures of some similar styles that a Marcos can have. I seen a Marcos that looks similar to yours too. I actually just bought the 2013 Overstreet Guide and I just received it today, so I have a better in-hand resource now too. This guide says that a Marcos is normally found in the Southern Central region of the US and is Late Archaic to Woodland in age. Here are some pictures I took for your consideration. If you have any questions about it I don't mind helping. Also here is a link to the online Overstreet site: Marcos | OverstreetID.com.
 

Attachments

  • 0411141531.webp
    0411141531.webp
    154.6 KB · Views: 173
  • 0411141531a.webp
    0411141531a.webp
    140.5 KB · Views: 188
  • 0411141530.webp
    0411141530.webp
    165 KB · Views: 227
Last edited:
Hi Rockheadhunter,
Thanks for the info. and your help, I really appreciate it. That's interesting you just got your book...small world..
I see what you see...and you could be on to something...one thing I see in the book under "Key" it says "angle of notches"...
Maybe its just me but on my point the notches seem more shallow ( not as deep and long)...than the pictures of the points in the book...
( look at the my pic. of the point as a whole as the pic. of just the notched end could be deceiving...)
 
They didnt make everything the same as we know it. Could be a variety of the ones already given as a possibility. Very nice looking point
 
They didnt make everything the same as we know it. Could be a variety of the ones already given as a possibility. Very nice looking point

Oh rock, there are many types that are readily and easily identifiable, not to mention they will also differentiate from other types.

Do you have any of overstreets editions?
 
Oh rock, there are many types that are readily and easily identifiable, not to mention they will also differentiate from other types.

Do you have any of overstreets editions?

Yeah I do and some other books also.
 
Does anyone have any good pictures of a Marcos point that could either point to or exclude this point as a Marcos?
( Other than the Overstreet)
 
Last edited:
Hey Rock, You are correct that no points can ever possibly look the same obviously...and you could very well be right about this being a variation/combination ...I know what you mean...But of course I am hoping for distinctive qualities when added as a whole would indicate a recognized style and period.. :occasion14:
 
What appears to be changed on yours is the length of the barbs and the base. That would make the notches more shallow. Yours is very symmetrical. From the pictures I see of the Macros type, not many are that symmetrical. Even the G9 one (in the third pic) isn't that symmetrical. I still wouldn't exclude a Marcos yet b/c that type is normally found in the state you found it. Yours could be an uncommon variation of that type.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have any good pictures of a Marcos point that could either point to or exclude this point as a Marcos?
( Other than the Overstreet)

Here are a few pictures I found on relicshack. All of these are identified as Marcos on the website.

12631A.webp13690A.webp12384A.webp
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom