Dave Rishar
Silver Member
Good explaination of the realities of television filming, FindersKeepers.
Didn't Triton put divers in 10-X a few times?
Didn't Triton put divers in 10-X a few times?
are you Double Clicking ?why are my posts doubling up?? Heck, how do you expect me to solve the oak island problem if I can't solve such a SIMPLE PROB S THIS. ?? jOSE Jose
are you Double Clicking ?
are you Double Clicking ?
![]()
I agree with you. It did look like it was planted BUT that may not be the case. What if they found the coin and the camers where off, the film crew would have them redo the find. OR they did put a lot of mud and stones on the bog and suppose they did find it in the mud and again they had to redo the find. What happen and how the film crew show it could be different. On a film set we have to do the shot many times before the film crew thinks they have it right. In most cases the film company gets it their way and we have no say. I can only guess what happen when they showed the coin. Was it plantedMarty said no and thats where I am. I am sure when they jumped in the water and thought they hit it big, the film crew had a lot to do with this part to. Marty and Rick did a good job , its the way the film crew showed them that looks bad. I've been there and done that.
Good question, I Know Ground Radar works best on a hard flat surface, but could it work in a boat on waterI was on Oak Island in my teens on a family vacation back in the 60's (we went lots of interesting places) I am just glad that someone is still looking to solve the thing. On the thought of ground penetrating radar in the swamp, would it work if it was mounted in something like a fiberglass Jon boat? and winched along a grid pattern? Maybe do the same thing with one of those big metal detector coils they were using and cover the whole of the swamp. I have seen people pull a big coil behind a four wheeler searching for meteorite, just mount the coil on the fiberglass Jon Boat.
There's still the issue of the carbon dating of the coconut fibres however Dave. I tend to side with this evidence as it is more concrete in my mind than a deciphered inscription that may not be correct.
I think the coin was probably planted, likely by a local.
That's certainly a possibility. If I were going to salt someone else's dig site to screw with them, that's probably what I'd use - something old, but very inexpensive and easily obtained. (Actually for about the same price you could get a Roman copper from Ebay and really mess with them!) But let's assume that this isn't the case, that the coin was not planted, and that it was a legitimate find. How does this affect existing theories, if at all? Remember, Spanish coins from that era are not uncommon beach finds all along the east coast. I don't know for certain of any that have been found in Nova Scotia, but they've been found in Maine. I'd be very surprised if they haven't turned up east of there. Does this coin mean something? It means that the Lagina brothers stand to make $3-4 if they sell it. Beyond that, maybe or maybe not. Hopefully they'll find something else in that area to add some context.
If I were going to salt someone else's dig site to screw with them, that's probably what I'd use - something old, but very inexpensive and easily obtained.