Kentucky Kache said:
af1733 said:
I believe the moon landing happened because it did happen. I didn't have to choose a side, as there's never been a question in my mind. Believe it or not, as I can see you don't, I don't have a problem for standing up for what I believe. Why else am I posting here now?
No, you believe it because you think you're right. I understand that. And yes, you DID choose to believe it, as did the whole world, myself included. There never was a question in anyone's mind until we found things to make us think.
You don't have a problem standing for what? It don't take much effort to float with the flow.
I don't believe I'm right
or wrong. I believe what I've seen and heard because I have no reason to believe otherwise. The "proof" you choose to believe is extremely unconvincing, and very clearly exists because someone owning a dislike of
something (government, NASA, Kennedy, Armstrong) chose to try and make an issue out of it.
And you asked
"You don't have a problem standing for what?" Did you just pretend to read my post??
This also lets me know that you consider yourself a maverick, one who goes against the grain. The question is, do you do this because
all of your beliefs are contrary, or because you crave the attention this brings you?
Kentucky Kache said:
af1733 said:
You yourself admitted this was a great victory for America and the people living in her, yet you don't believe it happened and have no problem telling everyone this should be taken away. I'm selling propaganda? Hardly. Along with martyr, maybe you should look up the word before you try to use it.
Taken away? I'm trying to take away the Moon landing? I must be a great fella.
Yes, your propaganda is to make those who think contrary to you look like a communist, or something that is hated. Propaganda.
This is exactly what your goal is. You believe it didn't happen, and you want everyone else to believe it as well. If this wasn't your ultimate reward, you wouldn't have brought it up in the first place. But you did. You asked a question, and as soon as someone said that it did happen, you began trying to convince them it didn't. This is your propaganda.
Kentucky Kache said:
af1733 said:
How about an experiment? Let's talk about the atomic bombing at Hiroshima, for example. Google you heart out, and find every site or reference you can saying this didn't happen. I bet you'll find just as much "evidence" for this stance as you would for your moon landing theory. Does that mean it's true?
Convince me that Hiroshima has anything to do with what we're talking about and you've got a deal. If you can't, please try a new tactic. I wonder if there is more for or against Hiroshima.
The bombing has plenty to do with what we're talking about it, unless you try to take it
out of the context in which I presented it. I made a very clear comparison between what may be found created by skeptics "proving" the bombing didn't occur, and the "proof" regarding the moon landing you choose to hang your hat on.
The very fact that you wondered aloud whether there is more evidence for or against the bombing is quite telling, actually. It means that you are more than willing to change your mind about world events if anyone in cyberspace tells you to.