in Oz:
Self-defence of property
Self-defence as a principle is available for acts in defence of property. However, the use of lethal force is probably not justified under the test set out in Zecevic, with the High Court noting that the only justification for the use of lethal force is in situations where the threat was such, that the person held a reasonable apprehension that death or serious harm may be the result of the attack.
Jurisdictions that make reference to the use of force in the defence of property, such as s 267 and s 274-278 of the Criminal Code 1899 (QLD), generally states ANY use of force in the defence of property must be reasonable and necessary. Therefore, force that is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm is for the most part, prohibited.
Note that you must prove the use of ANY force was necessary against the perp in your home! This includes restraining them. Homeowners have LOST in Court even on restraint.
You must prove to the Court that perp was using LETHAL force before you can use this defence. 2 cases of convictions of murder on the homeowner show this is very difficult to prove.
I am providing these details as some are calling for gun laws and other laws using the laws in Oz as an example.
EDIT:
$275.00 fine in Melbourne for riding a bike without a helmet.
$225.00 fine for running a stop sign or red light in a vehicle.
$175.00 fine for leaving your vehicle window open more than 50mm while parked (enforced with a gage)
