Large SPHERES....what are they?

stranger

Jr. Member
Jun 14, 2006
36
0

Attachments

  • Balls.jpg
    Balls.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 3,765
  • Balls1.jpg
    Balls1.jpg
    65.8 KB · Views: 3,781

Bluezman

Sr. Member
Apr 2, 2007
279
1
Detector(s) used
Minelab Musketeer Advantage
Monty, I'm with you.
I didn't say anything about "delete". I hope not. I was thinking more along the lines of "add", when I mentioned a pole.
Bluezman
 

Upvote 0

Monty

Gold Member
Jan 26, 2005
10,746
166
Sand Springs, OK
Detector(s) used
ACE 250, Garrett
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
No, I'm teetotaler. Haven't had a drink in nine years. It makes me say silly things so I had to quit. No sense making a fool of myself, I being so serious and astute in all matters. M :tard: nty
 

Upvote 0

Sleepless

Newbie
Mar 14, 2008
2
0
Seems I recall that people who were using teams of horse, mules or oxen sometimes needed a way to temporarily tie their teams for a while. If there were no trees to tie to, they would need some sort of an item to do that with and that they carried relatively light weights for that purpose. Some horses are taught to "ground tie", meaning that you can just drop the reins on the ground and the horse thinks its tied and will not move from that spot. Oxen with rings in their noses will not move if tied to an object, however light it might be in comparison to their weight. It may be made from cannon balls with the rod attached in some way, but I'm betting its for tying a plowing team so that an individual can take a lunch break. Stranger did say it was from old farming country.

Bob
 

Upvote 0

billjustbill

Bronze Member
Feb 23, 2008
1,089
659
Texas
Detector(s) used
Minelab SN/XS
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
The old windmills used to pump deep wells had to have weights used for bringing the tail around and shutting it down. The downwind versions needed a large counterweight sticking out the front to offset the weight of the odd shaped set of blades, too. Look toward that perspective.

Bill
 

Upvote 0

chong2

Bronze Member
Apr 25, 2006
2,041
140
El Paso, TX
Detector(s) used
Flippin Stick n good luck :)
wait........ so this has never been solved.............................................................................. right???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Upvote 0

sniffer

Gold Member
Dec 31, 2006
5,906
58
Kansas
Detector(s) used
XP DEUS
how about part of an articulation joint of an early tractor. I remember seeing pictures of a early four wheel drive tractor from the 30's, seems to me it was made in Illinois, I believe in Moline

Sniffer
 

Upvote 0

MonkeyBoy

Bronze Member
Feb 6, 2006
1,600
57
Virginia
Detector(s) used
V3i
Re: Large Balls....what are they?

stranger said:
Wow, I'm off for a couple of days and tons of new posts. Welcome to my misery...Glad someone else is obsessed with figuring out what these things are. Here are a few comments:

Distance between the balls is approx an inch....BARELY a finger width.

Connecting rod is solidly attached and from what i can tell and not threaded and screwed on. With that said, they have been a field for a very long time and rust would have prevented any threaded or sliding action to work properly now.

No way it could be a barbell, although that's what it looks like at first glance. Distance between isn't wide enough.

I say 20#....i havent weighed them, just a guess...I can weigh them if that would help any.

Barshot....As much as I'd like these things to be exactly that, I do find it difficult to believe that to be possible. Location of the find....middle of farm country AND the bar shot pictures I have seen are much farther apart. I suppose it would be possible to get transported here, but that would be like finding a shark tooth out in a field - know what i mean?

Weight of some sort? By far the most logical idea to me. The distance between them would make it possible to attach via a rope, or the rope could have been rolled up around the shaft.

No signs of wear of any sort on the balls makes this a logical conclusion also - but what for?

One final thought, just thought of this as typing this. It has been noted that the balls have a cut out area larger than the shaft...could there have been a larger "sleave" over the top of the connecting rod? This would have changed the "gear ratio" of one wind of a rope. Maybe a wooden sleave that has decayed over time? Just a wild thought, not sure why a sleave over the rod would be necessary, but could possibly explain the larger diameter in the balls.

Ok.. the funny thing this this post it.. last weekend I found my first sharks teeth.. dug up in the middle of a field!!! so???
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top