What's new

Lock help

Foster

Full Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
191
Reaction score
130
Golden Thread
0
Location
Columbus, ms
Detector(s) used
White's Prism III, White's TRX Bullseye
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Can anyone date the lock pictured? Thanks!! ImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1466390777.037920.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1466390796.022643.webpImageUploadedByTreasureNet.com1466390812.988353.webp
 
my guess would be somewhere between 1850 to 1870-ish
 
Upvote 0
Thanks!!
 
Upvote 0
Been searching the web for the manufacturer. Any clues on who made this one?
 
Upvote 0
Hard to nail down a maker, common style lock from the days before patent infringement laws, everybody copied everybody else.
 
Upvote 0
Foster, I'm going with DM&Co. (Davenort Mallory and Co.) 1852-1864 +/-lol 051.webp
 
Upvote 0
It's a sickness....really! Hi...my name is Greg and I'm an addict.
 
Upvote 0
Lock.webpAnother lock found a few years back at the same site
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2216.webp
    IMG_2216.webp
    642.3 KB · Views: 91
Upvote 0
That one is British-made. "WR" stands for "William Rex", KIng William IV of England between 1830-1837. The lock was made during that period.
 
Upvote 0
Love those old smokehouse padlocks. I found out an interesting fact through someone my husband follows on Facebook. He said if the lock cover simply says PATENT and was found in the US that the lock is probably an import com Great Britain because patent offices in the Us weren't formed until after the mid 1800's. Has any else heard this? I like your lock Foster and sorry to hijack the thread.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Im not clear on all the "Patent" lock either. Most of them that have no other markings, names, or dates....but "Patent" do seem to be British.
 
Upvote 0
jwarner51,

How did I find that? I'm almost ashame to say but,.......I walked into the other room and took a pic. He has many friends.
class ring 007.webp class ring 010.webp
class ring 014.webp class ring 008.webp class ring 012.webp
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom