Kevo_DFX
Hero Member
aarthrj3811 said:They are positive so the skeptics are on the negative side so they are the ones that are required to provide proof ..Art
Art,
You are wrong on this. I know it has been stated many times before, by EE, SWR, Ted, etc.; but just to reiterate:
It is the responsibility of the claimant to provide proof that their position is valid. The people that think LRL's are a fraud, do not have to prove anything. If I asserted that I had invented a bean that, when planted, would shoot a magical ladder up to heaven, it would be my responsibility to show proof that said bean actually existed and worked the way I described before expecting one dime from anyone for my magical bean.
From what I have seen (other than anecdotal evidence, which is not proof) the claimant(s) patently refuse to provide proof that LRL's work. That is why you have people challenging LRL and MFD "technology."
Regards,
Kevo