OK, I have read ALL of the post on this thread, why?, by the time I got to the last one, I wondered "why" myself. So here is my take on all of this (Could not help myself). It started with a little or unknown law, that few if any would have been aware of. "Metal tools on the beach" because of sexual assaults? I don't know, go figure, but where it went from there became a debate based on pure speculation on what might have happened between the two parties, as not even one of us was there, nor any videos or any one being of witness, or any details in any articles. Some "assume" that "The Guy" was being argumentative and refused to comply, and others "assume" it was the officer that was unreasonable in his approach etc. One or both may very well have been "polite" or neither may have been. None of us here REALLY know, now do we. Now, some laws are common and very well known by all of us, or should be, and others are so obscure or new, that they are unknown by most, if not all. As these post went on they became more argumentative and even insulting to each other. Some even seemed to be a contradiction or even hypocritical, as one poster stood out more then others in that way. It would seem he is all about law & order and when confronted don't ask, just comply, and even though the guy at the beach may never have known of such a law, he should never have asked, again no matter how obscure or unknown. I CAN agree with that if only diffuse a situation, but if confronted with a "law" so unexpectedly "out there", I would like to at least ask just what that law IS that I am breaking, and not be given a ticket because I wanted a possible answer to a valid question. Now as to the one "poster" himself? by his OWN post, he stated how he has been pulled over a "few" times for speeding, one time for 100mph in a 55mph zone, the other in a boat doing 60mph in a "idle" zone, but received No ticket because he was "polite" to the officer. Polite or not, in his case, he should have received a ticket and a fine, one reason, they ARE well known and posted laws, and he made the choice to ignore them, a few times, as he said. The sand castle guy was unaware of breaking any law. The guy speeding endangered anyone and everyone around him, the sandcastle guy had a "metal" tool building a sandcastle. Speeding guy received no ticket because "HE" was polite, the sandcastle guy got a ticket because he was not polite, and questioned the law? Or so some Think that may have happened. How can one even compare the two. Also stated, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"? Well then, I'm sure all of us here are well aware of all laws, no matter how obscure, especially the speeding guy. Here is just three examples that are "Current" laws in Florida. 1. A special law prohibits unmarried women from "parachuting" on Sunday, or she shall risk ARREST,FINE, and/or JAIL TIME. 2. It is illegal to SING in public while wearing a bathing suit. 3. Skateboarding without a license is illegal. These are current, and there are more. If YOU were approached with a possible ticket for breaking one of these "laws", would you not at least ask? (And how would? one undo a parachute jump). This thread has been beaten to death, and it all seems long on speculation, and short on fact. I'm returning to "Todays Finds" & "What is it?"