One Dowsed observation

[dowser]

Your posting in a thread that explains Dowsing tests that prove what I say .

All my tests have to do with, Energy, Frequency, and Vibration, and the Quantum dimension.
They are Observations of My confirmed Dowsing tests results..
Other Dowsers have their own results, some are different, from different abilities.

 

[Carl-NC]

I've tested a number of dowsers, not a single one could do what they thought they could do. They were quite surprised, too. If you want an honest assessment, I can suggest some test methods that are probably a bit more rigid than what you do.

 

[dowser]

I've tested a number of dowsers, not a single one could do what they thought they could do. They were quite surprised, too. If you want an honest assessment, I can suggest some test methods that are probably a bit more rigid than what you do.

I don't need to prove anything to myself, thanks anyhow.
I've opened many Watermelon till I found a sweet one, and they all looked and sounded the same..

 

[dowser]

It's called Dowsing, and i picked the name Dowser, but I'm using my frequency to read other Frequencies, I'm conjoining my frequency into other frequency lines.. Conjoining!

 

[achanceforgold]

I've tested a number of dowsers, not a single one could do what they thought they could do. They were quite surprised, too. If you want an honest assessment, I can suggest some test methods that are probably a bit more rigid than what you do.

It's okay that you don't believe.
No one is trying to force you to believe.

Others do believe in dowsing.
As some may believe in God or a number of other things.

I personally am interested in the subject and would like more information on what dowsers do and their abilities.

You are not alone in your skepticism. Many people don't believe.

I personally don't believe in Santa Claus. But I don't run around telling people he is not real.
It does me no harm if someone wants to believe in Santa Clause and I allow them to have their beliefs.
Or their beliefs about any subject such as what metal detector is better than others.

A number of members on T-net believe in dowsing.
They have a whole section just for them.
As they have sections for different detectors and many other things.

I am sure every dowser on T-net has faced criticism about dowsing such as yours.
But that doesn't stop their belief in dowsing. And I am positive they are not going to give up dowsing because Carl-NC said it doesn't work.

Please allow them their beliefs without the criticism and attacks.
You will change no one's mind with your approach.

Thanks

 

[Carl-NC]

Not attacking, heck, not even criticizing. Just offering what I know about topics. Take it or leave it. Ferinstance, many dowsers have heard about the Einstein quote but almost none realize it's a fake quote propagated by poorly researched dowsing books.

I've been on these forums for 27 years and have run across a lot of dowsers with a lot of beliefs, and personally met quite a few of them. I have often offered to show them the difference between self-deceptive test methods (which they universally employ) and reasonable protocols that eliminate self-deception. Many dowsers do not want to challenge their own beliefs -- "dowser" is one of them -- and that's OK with me. For the dowsers that want to, I've either personally tested them or offered them protocols they can do on their own to get more realistic results. I've never seen a dowser even come close to doing whatever it is they thought they could do, and they've always been quite surprised at how little of a change in the test protocol eliminates apparent success. And, most of the time, they go right on dowsing. That's fine, too.

Overall, the dowsing forum is no different than any of the other forums; it's a place for open discussion. Yes, I have a skeptical view of dowsing and I'll continue to chime in from time to time, especially when I see something stated that is objectively wrong. I find the topic fun and fascinating. Kinda like Oak Island, it's an interesting study in human psychology.

P.S. -- let me know if you want some realism injected into your own dowsing tests.

 

[achanceforgold]

Not attacking, heck, not even criticizing. Just offering what I know about topics. Take it or leave it. Ferinstance, many dowsers have heard about the Einstein quote but almost none realize it's a fake quote propagated by poorly researched dowsing books.

I've been on these forums for 27 years and have run across a lot of dowsers with a lot of beliefs, and personally met quite a few of them. I have often offered to show them the difference between self-deceptive test methods (which they universally employ) and reasonable protocols that eliminate self-deception. Many dowsers do not want to challenge their own beliefs -- "dowser" is one of them -- and that's OK with me. For the dowsers that want to, I've either personally tested them or offered them protocols they can do on their own to get more realistic results. I've never seen a dowser even come close to doing whatever it is they thought they could do, and they've always been quite surprised at how little of a change in the test protocol eliminates apparent success. And, most of the time, they go right on dowsing. That's fine, too.

Overall, the dowsing forum is no different than any of the other forums; it's a place for open discussion. Yes, I have a skeptical view of dowsing and I'll continue to chime in from time to time, especially when I see something stated that is objectively wrong. I find the topic fun and fascinating. Kinda like Oak Island, it's an interesting study in human psychology.

P.S. -- let me know if you want some realism injected into your own dowsing tests.

May I suggest Stoicism with a good foundation in Christianity.

 

[dowser]

Many dowsers do not want to challenge their own beliefs -- "dowser" is one of them -- and that's OK with me.

I know you tested the wrong Dowsers in the past, you've let us know before.
What does that have to do with me?
I've been writing that Dowsing power isn't constant since I started posting, yet you never tested anyone that suggested there was a Dowsing power, like me!
What do you know about realism?
Dowsing proof of tests, equipment, how to, and results, are posted here.
Out of my over a Dozen topics on the subject, which one are you trying to debunk?
First you need to acknowledge that invisible Frequencies exist, and are being resonated and duplicated at about one second pulses continuously.
You are one of the nicer skeptics, you seem to understand.
Not understanding Dowsing is typical, and if you read a book called, "Shape Power", by Dan Davidson, my mentor, you'll understand it even less!
Not one thing in there makes sense to me, and it's not my way, but it's believed and published, by words not proof of treasures.
Please explain how I should challenge my beliefs?, I'm confused, I'll admit!

 

[dowser]

Not your normal Dowsing book

 

[dowser]

With the knowledge of how mother nature uses the numbers 0-9 in Frequencies and all can be separated, it would make a Powerful Superhero!
"Frequency" The new Superhero.
Someone has ability to conjoin and rearrange Frequencies for different missions or adventures.
They can change their skin color, or texture, like an octopus.
Turn Lead to Gold...
Change the frequency sequence of a inedible organic substance to an edible one.
Travel between Gravity, and beyond time to other Galaxies and Universas in the quantum slip stream.
What else?

 

[dowser]

Not your normal Dowsing book

I got a reply from him on here, many years back.
I was posting about lightning and Dowsing, searching for the Dowsing power source.
I've been to his house in Sierra Vista, running Dowsing tests.
When I moved back to Michigan, he would solder up some kind of electronic device, for me to test with my rods.
That's when I stumbled onto my first Universal frequency/Master key 1.934 khz.
He sent a little generator, with that single frequency chip, and I put together a LRL device using a 12 v motorcycle battery, that had 2 pins, that stuck into the ground, when set down.
Being a Master Element Enhancement frequency, a signal is needed, to draw in any connection frequencies.
After 2 months of use, and ready to make more prototypes, and disguise the frequency, hiding it with others, it quit working?
Like always Dowsing power signal can't be created, only enhanced.
Like right now, my Dowsing power signal is terrible, and I have no clue, if it will get better!
Thanks Professor Davidson, without you frequencies would never have made sense to me!

 

[Carl-NC]

Please explain how I should challenge my beliefs?, I'm confused, I'll admit!

My tagline -- "I believe it, therefore it is true" -- is a warning (even to me) to always challenge everything you think you know, whether in the realm of politics, religion, or treasure hunting. In all these domains there are people who are actively trying to mislead, plus others who simply don't know what the heck they are talking about. Davidson's book, ferinstance, speaks for itself. Very loudly.

Folks who seriously want to hunt for -- and hopefully find -- treasure should probably not waste their time hunting for pretend treasures like Beale or Oak Island. Nor should they use fake treasure hunting devices like long-range locators. Separating these fictions from fact requires critical thinking skills which, sadly, are not taught in school and many people lack. It's something you have to pursue if you want it.

If you simply want to play with dowsing rods and fabricate a reality you believe in, then you have that. Practically every dowser I've known has done the same, and that's all they ever got out of it. If, instead, you want to really know whether your dowsing results are real or self-deception, I can offer some guidance.

 

[dowser]

If you simply want to play with dowsing rods and fabricate a reality you believe in, then you have that. Practically every dowser I've known has done the same, and that's all they ever got out of it. If, instead, you want to really know whether your dowsing results are real or self-deception, I can offer some guidance.

I know my Dowsing results are real, or I wouldn't have posted them!
Guidance for what, you are a non Dowsing Skeptic.
Start your Dowsing guidance Topic any time you want, you don't need my permission, others might want to see what you have to teach!
Please quit insulting me and my hobby, if you believe Dowsers are misleading people, maybe you should not read it.

 

[Limitool]

Please quit insulting me and my hobby, if you believe Dowsers are misleading people, maybe you should not read it.

Sir when you announce to the world that you can dowse and recognize cancer causing frequencies AND eliminate them that is "OUT THERE".

If your having fun and "learning something" good for you. But you shouldn't get upset when somebody questions your claims or asks how you came about the knowledge of a claim.

 

[dowser]

Sir when you announce to the world that you can dowse and recognize cancer causing frequencies AND eliminate them that is "OUT THERE".

If your having fun and "learning something" good for you. But you shouldn't get upset when somebody questions your claims or asks how you came about the knowledge of a claim.

Can I insult you for no reason, other than you wrote something i can't comprehend?
Insult the Dowsing subject, just don't read one post and decide I'm worth insulting.
I posted many Threads on the Dowsing subject, your arguments are uncalled for..
Disagree is one thing, but he's going beyond disagreement with insults..
I knew you'd be defending him, I expected no less!

 

[robertk]

Can I insult you for no reason, other than you wrote something i can't comprehend?

I didn’t see an insult. And what I’m about to say isn’t an insult either.

The problem isn’t comprehension. The problem is you post lots of outlandish claims that misuse or misunderstand a lot of scientific terminology, and don’t offer any real proof of these claims. Any time you get pressed for proof, you instead offer “reasons” for why you can’t. It’s on somebody else’s property, or the sun was having sunspots that day, or somebody in the next block was using their microwave. It’s always something.

All you ever really post is conjecture. You calling it facts doesn’t make it so. A fact is something that is true to everyone.

Again, this is NOT an insult to you or even to your methods. It is just observation of the content of your posts. You want us to believe and not question — great! Give us real evidence (or a repeatable, verifiable experiment) so that we can do that.

 

[dowser]

I didn’t see an insult. And what I’m about to say isn’t an insult either.

The problem isn’t comprehension. The problem is you post lots of outlandish claims that misuse or misunderstand a lot of scientific terminology, and don’t offer any real proof of these claims. Any time you get pressed for proof, you instead offer “reasons” for why you can’t. It’s on somebody else’s property, or the sun was having sunspots that day, or somebody in the next block was using their microwave. It’s always something.

All you ever really post is conjecture. You calling it facts doesn’t make it so. A fact is something that is true to everyone.

Again, this is NOT an insult to you or even to your methods. It is just observation of the content of your posts. You want us to believe and not question — great! Give us real evidence (or a repeatable, verifiable experiment) so that we can do that.

Try not to argue the Dowsing subject, I don't care what you understand or not.
This is about the post were he's offering guidance, questioning a real or self-deception.
No thanks!

 

[Limitool]

Can I insult you for no reason, other than you wrote something i can't comprehend?
Insult the Dowsing subject, just don't read one post and decide I'm worth insulting.

Who insulted you? Show me the insult?

I posted many Threads on the Dowsing subject, your arguments are uncalled for..

Who's arguing...? D.D. and I both inquired how you came about the knowledge of cancer. That's hardly an argument. We didn't post....

"What I did yesterday! I went over to a friend's house, dowsed a bad energy line, crossing their bed, causing both to have cancer. I located the frequencies on either end of the connection line, and stomped it out of existence."

YOU DID...! How is inquiring how you learned this about cancer arguing.... it's inquiring.

Disagree is one thing, but he's going beyond disagreement with insults..
I knew you'd be defending him, I expected no less!

Who are you talking about here? Carl-NC..? If so where did he insult you? And believe me he doesn't need me to defend him. He can take of himself... that I'm sure of.

 

[dowser]

Lots of questions, any Dowsing ones?