Hi there. Boy, did you miss some good stuff off of my keyboard. Some remains, here and there, but a Ghost of Nobody in snippets of quoted posts ...
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought you Masons were a little more thoughtful and well spoken then that ...
Perhaps, this is who the KGC morphed into, eh? All that gold was being relocated/retrieved to fund Major General Smedley Butler: For the record, since he was mentioned in a 'positive' light, FDR is of the Anglo-American branch, as is the Bush family (although acted as an intermediary of sorts with Hitler until he deviated from the plan). Teddy Roosevelt was even more reverent to the German monarchs in England. Melting coins to bullion to rebury to wait for that day, finally, when the South could rise again with ye 'ol Rebel Yell? Or a fascist/corporate entity, once known as the KGC, gets that money to fund Butler, and when he turns them down, intervenes between Hitler and the Anglo/New York/Zionist oligarchical branch and diverts that gold to his military? Yea, Rebel, my truth is a lot, lot more realistic than what most consider to be falsely true ...
To be a Freemason you must be unanimously initiated by the Order, as a gentleman without questionable character. To not be a freemason, is to be on the outside of that group looking in. This has led to many misconceptions throughout history about the organization, based strictly on the opinions of those people in group "B" who are on the outside looking in. L.C. Baker
Hmmm ... it appears you have transcended the state of 'derisive, giddy, giggling' into one of being entirely nonsensical. May I humbly suggest, Bro. Rebel, you are going the wrong way ... Do you have anything, insightful, thoughtful or meaningful to add to this? Or have we all seen the entirely dissapointing extent of what ya got for us? P.S. It is wholly unnecessary to take up space in this thread and on people's screens by quoting my entire post, video included. Certainly with your response. It does nothing but disrupt the flow of the conversation. But perhaps that was your intent, as you certainly don't seem to be here to add anything valuable to the conversation ...
Ummm ... okay. I'll make sure to reread the TOS to look for that double standard you grant Rebel, so I understand it better so as not to further provoke yer ire ...
True to YOU... doesn't fit in with me; WHERE is "Indy" Jones...? NAZIS are "on the rise"!
Maim objective was to see if your response would propose separation between Masons and K.G.C..releventchair
I don't know that I completely understood the thought you were trying to get across here. Are you suggesting a link between Kinross Gold Co. (KGC on the NYSE) and the KGC of the late 1800's? Or?
I tend to agree with a lot of what you're saying in this thread - keep it up. The big picture certainly must include the kgc (heavy hitters in their own right, to be sure), who may have been, like all faithful servants, 'useful idiots' - minions for a larger cause that they may not have been fully vested in. We don't know and anyone who does certainly isn't posting on this forum, IMO. Why would they, except maybe to continue building the legend? The flood of speculation about the kgc that began back in the '90's seems to have high-centered a bit lately, although LC Baker has made things interesting the past several months. Nonetheless, the action has always, and still is, in City of London, the city within a city, IMO.... Boy, alot of coincidences occurring there when the KGC was supposedly accessing caches to turn into bullion 'cause of the Gold Act, eh Springfield?
Quick question for you L.C. Baker, if you are still around. Have you, in your research, come across the name Upham in Texas and/or California, perhaps coming into financial prominence in the 1900's, perhaps around Depression time?
I suggest nothing, but it is just a name that has been nagging at me for quite some time that has my eyebrow raised, but have not followed through with any research.