And Kemper, you say: "
...Now someone is saying they are going to call HUD and confirm I was trespassing yet they are not seeking any proof of that are not stating they intend to show any." You've got to remember, that in most people's mind's eyes, if they can find someone in authority, that says "you can't do that", then in their mind's eyes, that
IS authoritative law. And at first blush, that does appear to be bullet-proof, doesn't it? Afterall, you can't argue with an answer straight from some HUD lawyer/legal-beaver, CAN YOU ? haha
All I can say to this is, that if we take that test of things out to its logical conclusion, then so too are we all in a big heap of trouble, everywhere we hunt. I bet there's not a speck of public land that nugs-bunny hunts, that
I too couldn't find someone in a position of authority, that would tell him he can't do that. Afterall, he's "digging up" the parks, right? He's taking things, removing, harvesting, collecting, altering, disturbing, defacing, etc.... right? And then I just pepper the question to the authority with key phrases like "holes", "liability", "indian bone", "cultural heritage", and I bet I can find a "no" anywhere ANY of us hunts.
But again, I'm saying this to argue the point that HUD vacant yards are ok. I'm just sayin' .....
