What's new

Rank these detectors if you will??

Pikeslumber

Jr. Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
30
Reaction score
39
Golden Thread
0
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Hello. I'm curious how people view these detectors whether it's through experience using them yourself or just your perception from what you've heard from other's you trust, read, etc.? I am curious how people would rank these for coin hunting and relics in moderate soil with DEPTH and TARGET I.D. being the 2 most important factors. I don't care about performance when it comes to gold prospecting or at the beach and not concerned with features like being waterproof, tones, single frequency or multi, I can read and weigh in those features. The detectors I am curious about are the Fisher F75, White's MXT All Pro, Equinox 800, XP Deus 2, Nokta Legend, ML Etrac. I am aware of the AT Max and Manticore and V3I and......, you don't have to tell me they are better than the 6 that I listed. Thanks in advance if you are willing to play all along.

Etrac
Deus 2
F75
Equinox
Legend
MXT AP

Where am I wrong?
 
Upvote 0
Hello. I'm curious how people view these detectors whether it's through experience using them yourself or just your perception from what you've heard from other's you trust, read, etc.? I am curious how people would rank these for coin hunting and relics in moderate soil with DEPTH and TARGET I.D. being the 2 most important factors. I don't care about performance when it comes to gold prospecting or at the beach and not concerned with features like being waterproof, tones, single frequency or multi, I can read and weigh in those features. The detectors I am curious about are the Fisher F75, White's MXT All Pro, Equinox 800, XP Deus 2, Nokta Legend, ML Etrac. I am aware of the AT Max and Manticore and V3I and......, you don't have to tell me they are better than the 6 that I listed. Thanks in advance if you are willing to play all along.

Etrac
Deus 2
F75
Equinox
Legend
MXT AP

Where am I wrong?
Deus 2
Legend
Etrac
Eqinox
MXT
F75
 
Equinox, Legend, Deus 2, Etrac, MXT, F75 Just my opinion. I have only used the Etrac and Equinox out of that list, but I'm familiar with the rest.
 
I've used all of them, but, not all equally. Each has their strong and weak points and better or worse depending on the ground conditions. That said, I would rank them as such:
Equinox 900 (or 700)
Equinox 800 (or 600)
Deus 2
Etrac
Legend
MXT
F75

In heavy iron, the Deus 2 would go to the top of the list, as it would if weight was the most important.....with the Equinox 900 and 800 next in second and third respectively.
If price is a major concern, the Legend would jump to first or second depending on which Equinox you compare it to. It's close to the 600 in price, but, not the 900. I doubt you can still buy an MXT new, so, not sure why that even in the mix, but, it's a good park machine. The F75 is still available last time I checked, but, although still a decent machine, technology has passed it by. The Etrac is a great silver machine still, and it's target I.D. is solid. It's days are numbered too, and not as good on tiny gold as the newer machines. It's weight is a drawback too.
 
No love for the F75? I thought it would be higher for depth?
I had both the F75 and the Deus2. Both had their trade offs in my experience. I found the F75 quite dependable and only complaint was the weight and the tendency to false when bumping stuff; the latter likely a result of my running it hot. I needed a lighter machine and the Deus2 fit that bill. Unfortunately I found the Deus to be quite aggravating on trying to pair up the headphones and coils. I also experienced early failures with batteries and was glad to get rid of it.
 
only complaint was the weight
I have both and while the F75 is slightly heavier it is far more balanced, whereas the Deus (1 or 2) is lighter but nose-heavy. For an 8-hour day I'd rather swing the F75.
 
You left the “rank” detectors out of the list.
 
Dang good detectors you picked!
 
It would be nice to see a new High end Fisher based on the CZ series with more SMF tech. Selectable audio and 2lbs or less. I would be in !!
The best designer/Engineer for Fisher, Bounty Hunter, Teknetics, namely Dave Johnson, died last year. Since then FTP is selling his older designed detectors (like the F75) and have concentrated on their security and optics line of products. Like Tesoro, the competition from Europe and Australia was a bit too much. Especially the cloning of the F75 by China.

A shame.
 
I've only used three of the Detectors on your list.

E-Trac - for 9 years - an truly amazing machine - but it's very heavy and has a very slow recovery speed - you need a small coil to hunt in iron.
Deus 1 - for 7 years - a fantastic machine but it's only single frequency - I'm not a jewelry hunter but if you are, it's not good at all on wet beaches.
Deus 2 - for 2 years - best thing I've ever seen - multi frequency - even better in heavy iron than the Deus 1 - a great beach machine too.

Good Hunting !
 
Criteria were Depth and Target ID (accuracy???) on moderate (mineralized???) inland soil.

Assuming the same sized coil on each detector and assuming selective digging due to the criteria the OP set:

Deus 2
Legend 1
Equinox 900
Equinox 800
-big gap here-
Etrac
-big gap here too-
F75
MXT

Top 4 are really close in performance.
Calling a US quarter or US nickel accurately at 10" deep is not difficult for them.

Etrac can call US quarters correctly at 7 to 8" here. US nickel at 6".

Last two are way behind due to extreme up and down averaging of target IDs in moderate iron mineralization. MXT's target name identification becomes a real joke in those ground conditions. Both the F75 and MXT can barely hit a 6" deep US quarter using a 10 to 11" coil in these conditions. They will call a 6" deep US nickel as iron or as a silver target at that depth also.

I've owned them all and used them in moderate to high iron mineralization daily.
 
They are all good machines .you have to rate the operator of the machine... pick one and learn how to use it . If your only finding coins 6" deep with a 10" coil YOUR DOING SOMETHING WRONG..
 
  • Like
Reactions: OBN
They are all good machines .you have to rate the operator of the machine... pick one and learn how to use it . If your only finding coins 6" deep with a 10" coil YOUR DOING SOMETHING WRONG..
If you are referring to my post, you are incorrect. Those top four detectors have capabilities that the others simply do not have as far as detecting in moderate to high magnetite mineralization on land. It doesn't matter how you set them up at least where I detect. It's not even close.

Before the Equinox 600/800 was released, the only decent detectors for the ground conditions here were the Etrac and CTX 3030. Multi IQ and the tech being used in Deus 2 and the Legend have made a huge difference as far as overall effective depth and target ID accuracy in moderate to high magnetite mineralization inland.

I almost gave up on coin, jewelry and relic detecting back in 2017 because I was so frustrated with all of the supposedly top tier VLF detector performance as far as depth and target ID accuracy, using them in public areas and private permissions where beep-dig everything was simply not an option. I was getting half or less of the depth that people detecting in milder soils were reporting and low and mid conductor targets were all showing up in the high conductor range unless those targets were 3" deep or less. Minelab's Multi IQ was an incredible advancement for those issues when soil conditions were not mild/perfect.

Here is a 4 minute video I made a few years ago featuring Deus 1, AT Pro and the Equinox 800 on a surface US nickel, 3" deep nickel, 6" deep nickel (well established target in the ground for almost 10 years under the spray paint cap) a surface US clad quarter and a similarly well established 6" deep clad quarter under the other spray paint cap. The sandstone flagstones are local to the area I live in and have a similar ground balance point to the actual ground that they are covering. They also are full of magnetite. I use them to keep the dirt under them from getting re-contaminated with man-made metal targets. They are 1" thick. As soon as I changed the Equinox 800 from multi frequency to selectable single frequency at the end of the video, target ID accuracy went out the window. I deliberately recorded the Equinox 800 with sensitivity on 11 of 20 and used its smallest 6" coil just to make the test more difficult. Equinox 800 results would have been even better with somewhat higher sensitivity and a larger coil.

At the beginning of the video I gently pump the coil on Deus 1 to activate the mineralization meter on the far right edge of the display. Magnetite mineralization fills up 75% of the mineralization meter.



I tried everything possible on Deus 1, AT Pro, AT Gold, AT Max, F75, F70, F19, MXT and its variants, DFX, V3i, Tesoros from Silver uMax to Tejon.....they all had similar poor results doing the exact same test and in the field as far as overall depth and target ID accuracy here.
 
Last edited:
Put 10 Priests in 10 rooms and ask the same question and you’ll get 10 different opinions on the answer. . Everyone is right to believe their opinion is the gospel.
My opinion is all of the machines listed are great, and I’d have a hard time putting one over the other since I use them all
 
I have been running a F75 since they first came out. Now, I am not incumbered by using corded headphones or having a seperate and attached 1" coil for pinpointing (an option that no longer exists). But I must admit that the investment I made in 2013, with a couple upgrades since (that the factory honored and completed) were admirable. But Fisher has fallen behind. Still using mine. But not what I would recommend to a new user. Though I am not sure the capabilities have been surpassed. Just the convenience.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom