🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Ring

sajtikus

Jr. Member
Mar 17, 2024
63
90

Attachments

  • IMG_5714.jpeg
    IMG_5714.jpeg
    197.6 KB · Views: 56
  • IMG_5715.jpeg
    IMG_5715.jpeg
    205.2 KB · Views: 46
  • IMG_5716.jpeg
    IMG_5716.jpeg
    237.2 KB · Views: 46

cudamark

Gold Member
Top Banner Poster
Mar 16, 2011
13,227
14,560
San Diego
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus 2, Equinox 800/900, Fisher Impulse AQ, E-Trac, 3 Excal 1000's, White's TM808, VibraProbe, 15" NEL Attack, Mi6, Steath 920ix and 720i scoops, TRX, etc....
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Well, it’s obviously not from that..
Really, that would have been my guess too. Is there a sterling or .925 mark on it? Otherwise, you will need to test it for the type of metal to start with.
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
S

sajtikus

Jr. Member
Mar 17, 2024
63
90
Really, that would have been my guess too. Is there a sterling or .925 mark on it? Otherwise, you will need to test it for the type of metal to start with.
It doesn’t have any mark or something like that! Should I clean it from patina?
 

Upvote 0

pepperj

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2009
37,571
139,316
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
Deus, Deus 2, Minelab 3030, E-Trac,
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
It's not bronze nor is of any other precious metal.
It does have a brass/copper look to it from being in the ground.

For age it could be 50 yrs old, or it could be 75 yrs old.:dontknow:

Though just because a site is dating back to 1700s doesn't mean the recoveries are as well.
Low end type of ring that isn't even close to that era.
Maybe not ball gum machine, but certainly a 5 & dime type ring.
 

Upvote 1

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top