Tom_in_CA
Gold Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
- Messages
- 13,803
- Reaction score
- 10,339
- Golden Thread
- 2
- Location
- Salinas, CA
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- Explorer II, Compass 77b, Tesoro shadow X2
... i wasnt aware of any changes to the rules. This dude carried all the rules around in his pocket..... .
thanx for answering that. You don't give any info. about the "trooper in PA (ie.: what type site, and "could the md'r have known", etc....). But as for YOUR SPECIFIC example, all I can say is this: If, as you say, it was a "rule", then you could have availed yourself of it. Ie.: it could be looked up, by oneself, somewhere. No rules or laws are "secret". If they're a park rule or code, the those exist somewhere in print that you can look up. Yes , what happened to you "bites", but just saying, that it doesn't mean that we need to ask desk-bound pencil pushers "can I?".
And yes I knows there's good and bad ways of asking (to induce a "yes", rather than an arbitrary whimsical "no"). But even at a police station, I've heard of strange answers. Like "ask at the park's dept.". Or "yes but you can't dig" (even though you never mentioned dig), etc..... So if you want to talk to a live person, perhaps you can ask: "where can I find a list of all the rules and regulations of muni codes involving park usage ?"
But back to your particular confiscation: Whenever I pose the question of "show me an example", I'm painfully aware that .... someday, someone will have an example of "cuffed and stuffed" for merely detecting a sandbox. In other words, no doubt someone WILL have a "dire scary story". My answer to this, is that so too, if you study news accounts long enough, can you probably find examples of someone jailed, fined, ticketed, and confiscated, for nothing but a tail-light out. By an over-zealous cop. I mean, sure ANYTHING is possible. I have a link to a guy who got a ticket for eating a hamburger while driving ! Does that mean none of us will eat an drive now ? No, of course not. We consider such things "flukes".
But back to your particular case, it could be argued that there was a rule that you could have looked up. And I would also say that his guy was way over-zealous, and this was a fluke, and you most certainly should have simply been appraised for future use. This is far from typical, and I would classify a fluke.