Maybe, though someone else can confirm it or not. 950 is often used as a silver mark for higher quality silver. That being said, it could also be a model number. But you knew that already.
It's very simple set nothing too ornate about the two
. But at less than $6 I thought I would take a shot. If they are silver they are in very good condition with little tarnishing, which has me a little suspicious especially being 950. It's just odd to me to see the 950 (used to the .925 or Sterling) and not see silver plate anywhere on the pieces.
I'm not sure. I did see something referring the trumpet mark as being a date code for the year 1938. This site has some examples of Reed & Barton 950/1000 pure silver marks, which I didn't know they produced.History of Silver Makers | Antique Sterling Silver Makers Im not finding any examples of Reed & Barton pattern No. 950 that look like those, but I didn't really go deep in the search. For what they cost, you didn't loose any skin IMO if they're not solid silver.
It’s a safe assumption with a Reed &Barton item that if it’s not marked appropriately it’s probably plated....that being said if you’re still not sure...file past the surface plate and acid test the core of the item to determine the true composition...hope this helps