What's new

Some more "natural erosion" for the fools who think Nefertiti was not here 🙄 - An ancient carved Aten hieroglyph

TiBorn

Full Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
189
Reaction score
63
Golden Thread
0
Location
Ticonderoga
Detector(s) used
Kellyco Predator II, Bounty Hunter Quickdraw 2
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I guess we just can't see eye to eye
 

Attachments

  • 20250826_150116.webp
    20250826_150116.webp
    723.7 KB · Views: 215
Upvote 2
Amenhotep III more likely, but that's just my oppinion.
 
I guess we just can't see eye to eye
What do you think is carved on it? I do not see any carving at all. Maybe you could highlight or trace or explain what you see?
 
Sorry, it is natural errosion and pareidolia.

More examples of pareidolia....

Rose with skull
1000026250.webp
.
Man on mars.
1000026251.webp




Natural rocks
1000026252.webp


1000026254.webp


All are natural rocks in Pareidolia Museum in Japan
1000026255.webp


Formed by nature in Badlands of SD.
1000026253.webp




MORE EXAMPLES IN LINK BELOW
 
Last edited:
My camera is not great but it 100% is an eye made by man.
20250827_084834.webp
 
My camera is not great but it 100% is an eye made by man.
I don't think the camera is the issue.

Are you carving the rock yourself? Here's the rock as you originally posted it yesterday (on the left), and then the rock as you posted it today. Clearly the rock has changed.

Your original images:

20250826_150116.webp 20250827_084556.webp

Side by side with background removed and size roughly matched. Angle is slightly different, but not enough to account for the changes. Click to enlarge.

rockdiff.webp
 
I don't think the camera is the issue.

Are you carving the rock yourself? Here's the rock as you originally posted it yesterday (on the left), and then the rock as you posted it today. Clearly the rock has changed.

Your original images:

View attachment 2222805 View attachment 2222804

Side by side with background removed and size roughly matched. Angle is slightly different, but not enough to account for the changes. Click to enlarge.

View attachment 2222806
Yes it has to be.... Whatever it is... 🤣
 
I don't think the camera is the issue.

Are you carving the rock yourself? Here's the rock as you originally posted it yesterday (on the left), and then the rock as you posted it today. Clearly the rock has changed.

Your original images:

View attachment 2222805 View attachment 2222804

Side by side with background removed and size roughly matched. Angle is slightly different, but not enough to account for the changes. Click to enlarge.

View attachment 2222806

No reply, "Are you carving the rock yourself? " It has obviously recently been altered .
 
No reply, "Are you carving the rock yourself? " It has obviously recently been altered .
Even if you are carving it yourself...all you created was a hole. There's no structure on that rock. there are not pecks, no grooves being formed in any way. There's nothing manipulated by human hand in the very first pic. nothing that has been altered to a petroglyph. It's a rock. If it has value to you as you see something, then embrace it as it is. But don't alter it then and embellish.
 
a little humor is always appreciated here... what other finds do you have?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom