The Apollo Moon Landings Were Real! Not Fake! Photo Proves It!

[Cool Hand Fluke]

The Apollo moon landing were real! New NASA photos prove it!

This August 2011 image made available by NASA shows paths left by walking astronauts, single lines, and lunar buggy tracks, parallel lines, from the 1972 U.S. Apollo 17 moon mission. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter made this and other photographs of lunar landing sites from 13 to 15 miles above the moon's surface. (AP Photo/NASA)

 

[Felinepeachy]

Oh sure, they say it's a photo of the moon but is it? LOL

 

[TheHarleyMan2]

If you zoom in on the picture you can see the lunar module and its shadow!

 

[allan]

I used to think it was real til Jeff said something in another post lol , isn't that what they would want us to see ? when they put someone from my family on the moon and show me live feed of them waving... I will believe it ... maybe

 

[Dano Sverige]

So you're not going to believe in God until he comes down and shakes your hand then?

I remember some years ago now, NASA released a video of a Mars mission and film taken by the Mars rover or whatever it was called. As it meandered through the red dust and rocks something to the left of centre burrowed away under the dust at a fast rate of knots, as though startled. It caused a sensation!
Then someone realised they'd released it on April 1st! It was later admitted as a joke, but i think it put NASA and it's case for proving things decades behind where it was!!

I have no problem believing the apollo missions went to the moon. The only problem i do have is that i don't believe Apollo 11 went to the moon! Without going into detail, i believe that mission was faked because the Russians were going to beat you to it!

 

[FarmerChick]

I believe it was real point blank.
don't need nothing extra LOL

 

[allan]

So you're not going to believe in God until he comes down and shakes your hand then?

exactly

 

[jeff of pa]

Nice pic from Area51

Of course John Archer was on the Moon already in 1950

The camera Crews Pic proves it

 

[bigscoop]

Silly people. Where's the cheese? We all know from our earliest educations that the moon is made of cheese. No, wait,....from the pics it looks like it could possibly be baby swiss? And so the mystery continues.

 

[Saturna]

The lunar rover would be worth a fortune on Ebay.


Shipping would be a hassle mind you.

 

[fistfulladirt]

There was a Unicorn in my backyard yesterday.

 

[jeff of pa]

The lunar rover would be worth a fortune on Ebay.


Shipping would be a hassle mind you.

 

[mlayers]

If it is real big deal. We have spent a lot of money on space travel and we have gotten no where but up in space. We have only gotten to the moon and for what a few rocks. If they spent that kind of money here in the USA we wouldn't be in this bad of shape.....Matt

 

[Dano Sverige]

The lunar rover would be worth a fortune on Ebay.


Shipping would be a hassle mind you.

Gold Hasselblad cameras would sell well too!

 

[Jeep]

This is all the proof I needed

 

[paratrooper]

Of course they went to the moon. How else would they have found Alice Kramdens body

 

[goverton]

If you blow up that pic and change it to color, you see Wallace and Gromit!

 

[Michigan Badger]

The moon landing happened and actually turned out to be a major disappointment. Many who took part probably wished they hadn't (this fact was mostly withheld from the general public). Prior to the moon landing scientist calculated that the dust depth on the lunar surface would finally disprove the religiously motivated new earth myth (creationism) but as it turned out the dust depth actually ended up supporting only about 6,000 years of accumulation which agrees with the biblical account of creation (calculated by genealogical records in the bible). This fact went entirely against one of the main reasons for the mission. This is, to disprove the bible. This has always been one of the main reasons for all space exploration. For this reason and others the movement to disprove the landing is probably now being encouraged by some who know for a fact it happened.

The landing happened alright. Much to the chagrin of the lion's share of our scientific base.

 

[Arizona Bob]

...NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter made this and other photographs of lunar landing sites from 13 to 15 miles above the moon's surface. (AP Photo/NASA)

The moon has almost no atmosphere, right? Then someone 'splain to me why a satellite orbiting more than 200 miles above the earth can clearly photograph the license plate on your car, but a lunar satellite orbiting only 15 miles above the moon (with no atmosphere) takes pictures so crappy looking?

Something's not right. We should be able to count the bolts on the lunar rover and read the Made-in-America tag on the lunar lander. Next they'll be telling us that a strong solar wind blew away the flags that were planted!

 

[homefires]

Never Mind the Moon! Man has made it to Mar Too!