Tom_in_CA said:
parisdakarbmw, it's not easy being a cop, so you have my utmost respect.
As regards to your post here: This thread, in context, is the sidewalk strip between the sidewalk, and the street, right? Yet repeatedly in your text, you refer to it as it were not public property. For example, that it might be considered "theft" because it was on "someone's property", etc.... But isn't that the whole point of the thread though, that this is public property, so there is no "trespassing" or "property owner's permission" and such at stake here, right? I mean sure: we'd all agree there's a little common sense and discretion at stake here (since afterall it's right up against people's lawns, and they do mow it afterall

). But strictly speaking, it's not "private property" as you allude to in your paragraph 4, etc... Unless I'm mis-understanding you, and you're changing the subject to something else.
And as for courthouse lawns, again, how can there be "criminal trespass"? Aren't those courthouse lawns simply a city park, like any other park in town? And your characterization of using words like "digging plugs out of the sod" and "ripping up" the lawn is hardly the image we'd apply to ourselves (it somehow implies geeks who're going to leave craters there). But in any case, retrieval issues aside for the moment: there is no "criminal trespass" for being on a courthouse lawn (unless they're fenced and off-limits for some strange reason??)
Good points. I understand where you are coming from, but here is a better explaination. The county right of way (in my jurisdiction) is 10 feet from the paved surface. Although the local government may use the area to add a sidewalk, or expand the road, most property lines go to the street. True the government may use the property, but it still belongs to someone. Keep in mind I hunt for arrowheads, and MD myself.
If it is a public right of way you can walk there, but just because something is there doesn't make it free for the taking. Examples are mailboxes, or flower beds, stone decorations and such. The government may change those lines for public use, but the land is still owned by someone other than ourselves. If you dig something up on property that isn't yours without permission.....Someone could construe that as theft.
The manicured lawns also cost money to maintain. I have pressed charges for more extreme incidents such as people riding a motorcycle across a school lawn, and leaving tracks. Granted that was done in a malicious manor, it still was done and changed the lawn from it's original state. All I'm saying is that if you are basing your ability to detect on the fact that the land is owned by the local government, and it's ours to detect on... That's not correct. Common sense would keep these incidents from coming up. Go when it's a holiday weekend, and stay away from the structure so people don't accuse you of stealing little things that may have been missing or damaged. Most places have cameras, and I wouldn't want to be the guy picking stuff up near a building (legit md stuff) and then something turn up missing from a truck just out of the cameras view. Just good to stay away from.
When I mentioned ripping up the lawn, and digging up plugs, that was in reference to a ticked off person calling to complain. They won't tell the dispatcher, or the police officer that you were using an ice pick to gently probe the soil. They will make you out to be digging a four foot shallow grave right in the middle of the lawn.
You shouldn't have an issue detecting on the side of the road, but if push comes to shove....You could be liable for whatever the property owner, or government concocts as damages (no matter how silly it sounds.. Read the newspaper..If they will issue a little girl a ticket for a lemonaid stand without a permit, or business license, we could encounter this issue at some point)
Criminal tresspass to property simply states that if someone alters, defaces, or breaks any property of another under $500 they could be guilty of a misdomeanor. In it's true context you could be guilty of altering the property by disturbing a patch of grass.
We use something called "Spirit of the law", and the fact that you weren't intending to cause damage, or cause tax payer money to refurbish would keep you in good standing.
Now I think we all understand that if there is a side walk, that makes it ok for pedestrians to travel, and you have a legal right to be there. Government property however such as parks, and office buildings fall under a different law. If a reasonable person is there for a legitimate reason during normal hours, it shouldn't be an issue. If you are on the courthouse lawn at 03:00 hours (near a sidewalk) you could find yourself being looked at by the cops as a candidate for loitering, and prowling.
I'm not trying to ruffle feathers, but the property belongs to someone, so just keep all that in mind. If someone decides to force the issue, they could press charges for several things.