Hello again,
Not trying to be "picky" here but that Nelots treasure story was plagiarism on the part of Thomas Penfield, not John Mitchell. I know Penfield "borrowed" other folks tales, and anyone who writes of any lost treasure that has been published before is sort of "guilty" of plagiarism in that you are re-telling a story, right? I am not trying to 'defend' Penfield here, but he apparently did not expend a lot of time checking his sources before going to print - but is this not a case of mis-attributing the plagiarism onto Mitchell when it was really Penfield? I would appreciate if this could be clarified, thank you in advance,
Oroblanco