I feel for those who are suffering damages, but man will never beat nature. Maybe instead of people having to own those million dollars lots that run to the beach, for no other reason than to prove their wealth, there could have been maybe a 500-foot buffer between high tide and private property. That buffer would make more beach accessible to everyone and look at how many billions of dollars in damages could have been prevented over the years. I don't mean just California but all coastlines. I know there has been somewhere close to 30 houses washed away here on the North Carolina beaches in the last couple years. How much lower would the bill for hurricane damages have been? Exceptions could be made for necessary shipping ports, public beach access, etc. but no private home, condos and such right at the waters edge.Yesterday, while I was witnessing high tide at the Carlsbad, Ca. beach, a TV crew was doing an interview next to the boulders that form a seawall. You an imagine what happened next.
A set of waves came in and inundated the reporter and his cameraman. A crowd was nearby and applauded.
A bit of humor is necessary when considering the physical destruction; roads, seaside parking lots, local businesses that rely on beachgoers traffic; even the AMTRAK line next to the ocean.
The cost to repair this El Nino in Calif will be in the billions and take years--if ever started.
The waves now bang against the seawall. As they retreat, only cobblestones remain where once were wide sandy beaches. It's a wonder of nature to watch, but sad to realize the results.
Don in SoCal
1877 was a different world back then compared with the technology we have today. So an event today would be treated entirely differently from how it was treated in India in 1877. It was the same during the Irish potato famine caused by potato blight. Ignorance and greed were two driving factors that exacerbated the 1877 event back then.The El Niño That Killed 50 Million People Is Back
or so we are told..![]()
Time to go for a little stroll with the detector. No sand might produce a few older recoveries.Yesterday, while I was witnessing high tide at the Carlsbad, Ca. beach, a TV crew was doing an interview next to the boulders that form a seawall. You an imagine what happened next.
A set of waves came in and inundated the reporter and his cameraman. A crowd was nearby and applauded.
A bit of humor is necessary when considering the physical destruction; roads, seaside parking lots, local businesses that rely on beachgoers traffic; even the AMTRAK line next to the ocean.
The cost to repair this El Nino in Calif will be in the billions and take years--if ever started.
The waves now bang against the seawall. As they retreat, only cobblestones remain where once were wide sandy beaches. It's a wonder of nature to watch, but sad to realize the results.
Don in SoCal
I saw that in California. People building houses right along those beautiful mountain streams at the bottom of the canyon. And every few years a good rain or snow melt would wash down the gully and clear them all out. I commented to one of the locals that maybe they’d stop building there, and he said “Nah, they’ll build it right back. Insurance pays for it so they don’t care.”Building on a 100-year floodplain (an area with a 1% annual chance of flooding) is generally permitted by local and federal authorities.
Use Critical thinking... Check out the sources!The El Niño That Killed 50 Million People Is Back
or so we are told..![]()
I think that was a parable, not an engineering statement!The Bible talks about the foolish man who builds on the sand. That's basically the entire coast of Florida with the exception of a few parks.
No, it's common sense.I think that was a parable, not an engineering statement!
- Geowizard
Oh, well, if AI said it then it MUST be true!We can debate semantics and true meaning of a religious verse or let AI settle it.