Oroblanco said:
HOLA amigos,
Cubfan, I sent you a reply via PM, so as not to bore our friends here with another too-long post.
Blindbowman you have said that you have evidence that you are not willing to post publicly, evidence that would prove your case conclusively. Is it safe to assume that you will release the information when you publish your discoveries? What about the ball court - did you manage to take any measurements of the dimensions of it? I presume that you have recorded the latitude/longitude of every site, do you see anything significant in these coordinates? What about the offer of our amigo Cubfan to accompany you to examine the sites as an un-biased witness, would that idea be acceptable to you? You could ask him (or anyone you choose to allow to accompany you) to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which would give your sites some legal protection against someone leaking the locations. What about the questions posited by our amigo Gossamer? How do you do a psychological profile on a person who is no longer alive? Do we even have enough information to make an ACCURATE profile of Jacob Waltz?
I have reasons for doubting that Waltz was some kind of mad-dog killer, firstly - just look at his relationships with his friends Julia Thomas and Reiney Petrasch. Would a serial killer go out of his way to help save a friend from losing her bakery business by digging up his own gold to bail her out? Why should Waltz have allowed Holmes to live on that hot and angry day, when he caught Holmes tracking him, and Holmes spotted Waltz up ahead with him dead in his rifle sights. See these kinds of details just do not fit with at least a majority of murderers amigo, and I got to know a number of them on a personal basis, daily, having worked with them in a maximum security prison in VA some years ago. A cold blooded killer doesn't usually form close friendships, certainly not with women (exception, mothers) nor youngsters. The people who knew Waltz while he was alive had no doubts that he was capable of killing, and few would take the chance of testing him - yet think about how a serial killer operates amigo, do you really feel that Waltz fits with the pattern? I (respectfully) fail to see it, at least at this point.
I don't know what has set you off amigo but assume that you are dealing with a lot of stress, especially worry about your brother. I hope that his health will soon be on the mend and you will not be under so much stress. Good luck and good hunting, I hope you (and everyone reading this) find the treasures that you seek.
your friend,
Oroblanco
this is going to be my last post for some time . its my brithday and i am going to reward you for a good honest reply , i value your replies more then any one here on the web site ...
"when you publish your discoveries?"
i will not be publishing them...
What about the ball court - did you manage to take any measurements of the dimensions of it?
it no longer matters at this piont , i hold my self respoonsible for the danger i put my brother's life in .. i find my self out side of the modern culture of our times and it is my own failuare to relate at normal levels to the people with this culture ... and yes i do know the messurements of the ball..
"do you see anything significant in these coordinates?"
that would be a under statement .. these site were sellected .they are not random ,you have all filed to under stand the ball court in question is not 500 years old or even a 900 years old ,IMHO it is closer to 9500 years old , its dirrect location links it to chicomoztoc dirrectly .. my thoery is that they came out f the catcoms and had created a sport they they held secerd .this sport surfaced with them and thus chicomoztoc is the oldest court ever made by anyone ..
"What about the offer of our amigo Cubfan to accompany you to examine the sites as an un-biased witness, would that idea be acceptable to you? You could ask him (or anyone you choose to allow to accompany you) to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which would give your sites some legal protection against someone leaking the locations"
my own presonal safity was a greater interest to my under standing of the matter at hand ..at this piont i interest to return to the site after what has happend ..if my brother fails to recover i will not retrun to the site .. this is a shame i must own ... i know this is the real chicomoztoc ...
it will no dout fade in to time ....
What about the questions posited by our amigo Gossamer,
she maybe your amigo, in my opioion she lacks a under standing of the legends and details that can not be under stood in a week end ..and her dirrect finger pionting makes me unwilling to answer anything she wishes to know ...let her pay her do's then she can refine her respect level to those who have spend many years researching .....she is no dout a very smart and given to her ways yet they are not respectfull IMHO ...
"How do you do a psychological profile on a person who is no longer alive?"
most profileing is done with out the dirrect link to the sorce .. it is created by under standing what you do know and how that was created by the target and under standing what that target was thinking at the time . what motives he had and what logic he bases his reactions to .. these pattern are seldom changed ...and are often isolated to the state of mind of the target at the time of the events in question ...
"Do we even have enough information to make an ACCURATE profile of Jacob Waltz"
frist you must under stand the profiling dose not need to be isolated to his known beheavores .. and you can create a few profiles with what is known already ..
my profile of waltz changed as i seen his reactions and started to defind the layout of site 4 ...
a serial killer like waltz would have had all most no one to trust and even trying to trust someone like his nephew back fired in a violint reaction to a given event .. adding to the death of his nephew . and i beleive that event is the only reason waltz did not shot dick holmes when he was about the same age as jesses ...when waltz killed him ..
remind your self .Reiney Petrasch was a young man near the same age as well ...as for a relatetionship with julia at that age he had weekend to his health and this controlled his reactions ,often serial killers stop killing when the triger is removed , he no longer at the mine dirrectly .. note i stated the killings all took place at the site .. this was one of the main reason i feel these events are part of his pattern ...
i will be glad to walk you threw them in order
he killed the 3 prealta to get the mine .. he had never killed before this event thet we are aware of .. yet he stated he killed others after this event , the fact he kills 3 people in the event and out right plans the last of these 3 killing in cold blood . dose fit the actions of a serial killer ...
note he gives little details about the 2 soldiers..
unlike the event of his nephew , this changes waltz level of control over his serial killing .. he feels remores over the death of the nephew , IMHO this is the only reason he did not later shot dick holmes ..make the misteak once not twice .. looking down the sights at dick holmes and knowing how ad he felt after killing the nephew would have stoped a smart man from makeing the same misteak twice .. and waltz was a very smart man ...
the prospector rides into waltzs killing area , it is my opioion waltz talked with him a few mins knew the dirrection that the prosector was headed only when closer to his mine and knew that was the only way off the mt ... he waited untill the prospector started to ride away an shot him ...or was talking to him at the time i have some logical reason to think waltz did in fact stop at the nephew grave more then once ..
after this event his will to defind the mine was impulisive at best , note he dose not kill again .. i beleive the prospector was near the nephew grave .. that could have also have been the reason for his death , a over reaction to protect the nephew even a reaction of guilt ...
what goes threw a mans mind after days or weeks in the desert ,we can only guess as to the reason for these events , yet if my pattern of his action are proven .. we can under stand what his motives were and what logic was takeing place at the time of the events . thus the events have a nature to them and this nature can relate to there patter of how they lay out on the site ,, they may be evidence that has been lost that would explan details we may never fully under stand , yet they patterns are clear and waltz reacted in a prodictable manner based on a sound known logic...
"some kind of mad-dog killer" that would not be the case with waltz . these were killings that took place in one given area in a pattern that links them togather .. waltz started killing trigerd by a life time of saddness hunting for his dream ..when he found him self in the presence of the dream he took it ,, he reacted to the conditions at hand , the rest were to keep the dream safe . he knew he had cross the line with the nephew's killing ...this had a deeper meaning that would defeet waltz in time ...waltz would not have killing anyone unless they came into the safe zone of his mine , i beleive he watched others pass with out them even knowing it...the wording of the miltary trail conferms this ...
"Would a serial killer go out of his way to help save a friend from losing her bakery business by digging up his own gold to bail her out?"
yes . in fact it was prodictable that he would try to repent his killing of the nephew in some manner . often a act of good faith or helping someone near him . at this piont in his life .. he knew what he had done was wrong and the act of helping her is a sign of a man 's remorse....
he may have little to no prsonal feelings toward julia at all.. it may have been more a basic reaction to event that she did not know about .. h never tells her about the nephew ,, this would be a logic reason why ...it would degrade the honerable thing he did for julia ..she could react in a poor way makeing a man's repent meaningless ...
i beleive this is the true nature of waltz ...
this could be waltz told dick holmes the acount of the deaths ...
if dick holmes under stood the logic and pattern of the events . he would have realized he came very close to being a name on waltz's list ..
waltz was rare type of serial killer ,and yes he dose fit the profile , if a killing is related to the next he is a serial killer by definition...yet the motives change be a pattern of logic ...some times the next killing is a reaction to the one before it . this is for the most part the case with waltz...
yes IMHO waltz was a rare type of serial killer .. it started with the forfillment of a dream and a greed to own that dream at all cost ... the events of killing the 3 prealta for the mine started the ball rolling and the line was crossed when he killed the nephew . from then on the rest was reactions related to that nephew killing ...even his bed side acount proves this very likely the reason for his actions ..IMHO
i think if you helped someone reach their dreams only to find out you may have unknowing played a roll in their death ...
explans it all ...
this is my brither we are talking about ..
you have a replie good luck to you Oro ...
so under stand this if nothing else ...
" i did prove one thing . it dose not matter if anything is ever found out there in those mts ....the fact remains it could still be there and my expeditions and research have prove this "