Tunnel Rat;
I watched the Youtube video and the Grizzly III will work, as it's working in some ways like a rocker box used to work, but without the rocking action. In fact, the whole design reminded me of the similar design of an old school rocker, but with modern construction for lightness to facilitate transportation, with diamond expanded screen to create multiple small vortices, and with a grizzly that's hinged for dumping. Furthermore, the collection tray with the hinged snaps is an advantage of modern fabrication as well, as is the screen under the grizzly.
I'm a little confused that they didn't show the operator, after he'd removed the carpet, running water over the bottom tray to wash out every bit of material that usually gets trapped
under the carpet, tight against the tray. In my situation, whether using a stream sluice, high-banker, or a surface suction sluice (Triple-S mining, formerly known as dredging), I've often recovered gold from
under the carpet, gold left on the tray. Perhaps though, with the small amount of water (and force of water) used to process the limited material during the day, there's not enough dirt moved to allow any buildup under the carpet, but there's usually some gold right where the top of the mat rests, if not lodged slightly under that lip.
But, for those of you that high-bank, Triple-S mine, or use in-stream sluices, I'd always rinse that tray spotlessly clean after I'd pulled the carpet or miner's moss. As an added visual bonus on the specific gravity of gold, any gold on that tray will move very slowly as you rinse water through the tray. The process lets you see just how lazy gold is as it resists the water's force and moves sluggishly down the tray from top to bottom.
Back to the original topic, dipping all of that water is definitely a time consuming process, and it would take much longer to process significant amounts of material on any given day. However, just like using a rocker, you'd be able to process far more in a day than you'd be able to do with a pan.
For people that only want to move a smaller amount of material in the day, I think it's a perfect fit.
Having said that, I can see how the Grizzly III, coupled with a
gentle side to side action while using the dipped water, would catch the fine gold well.
So, your decision is whether to go slow and catch fine gold, or to work faster, processing more material, knowing you'll lose some flour gold with an in-stream sluice.
All the best,
Lanny
http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/metal-detecting-gold/69-bedrock-gold-mysteries.html