I found this on a dig but not sure if it is a bullet or how old??
If it has a jacket, it could be 9mm. I can't tell for sure. Maybe .380 ACP.Take several different measurement around the bullet and give us an average (of at least where you think it’s the most accurate). Bullet has been shot, so there’s been deformation, and it has oxidation/patina. I’m sticking with a .38
Not to be argumentative, but assuming you measured an unfired bullet? If so, I agree 100% with your measurements and theory. However, the bullet in question has been fired, and even with no obvious impact deformations that does/can change measurements, thus the request for an “avg” diameter measurement. Additionally patina can add up to .01”, so .02” accounting for both sides of the projectile. With the color of the patina, it’s an older bullet, and given the prevalence of calibers at that time (think horse, not zebra), I’m sticking with .38.I just measured my police Positive 38 cal and at the widest diam, its .350 so at .400 its not a 38 cal
So,, you agree that putting a 38 special round on target at 50 yards is a pretty skilled shot ? not sure if i understood you correctly ?...To AstralDruid: For several years I shot in competitions where the ONLY gun and caliber was a Model 10 S&W Police Special. The loads were very light, typically with. few grains of Unique. This sort of leveled the field perhaps, but nonetheless the accuracy at 25 and 50 yards was nothing short of amazing. That experience taught me one thing. When the big bore guys stepped up, so did the target size! In all my years of shooting all kinds of weapons, I've never seen a possible shot with a big bore! Heck, even Elmer Keith admitted to that fac
Good morning, in regards to total Patina build up I would guess by the looks of the rifling not being covered up I would say the patina build up to be maybe .005 - .010 total diameter would be .370 with a total build up of patina .020 your basic debit card measures .028 and that slug is no where near that amount of patina.Not to be argumentative, but assuming you measured an unfired bullet? If so, I agree 100% with your measurements and theory. However, the bullet in question has been fired, and even with no obvious impact deformations that does/can change measurements, thus the request for an “avg” diameter measurement. Additionally patina can add up to .01”, so .02” accounting for both sides of the projectile. With the color of the patina, it’s an older bullet, and given the prevalence of calibers at that time (think horse, not zebra), I’m sticking with .38.
A weight in grains couple well disprove my opinion if the OP has that capability.
Hi Picket, No such animal in a "Rim Fire" with that large of a caliber. 22 Calibers are rim fire.It is probably from a .41 rimfire cartridge.