Considering its his job on the line good luck there...I would say If you get a no on hunting because of Liability
something along this line
, "Would you mind If I detect without your Permission so you Don't have the Liability issue ?"
.......Therefore, I would look for a Construction Trailer and ask to speak to the Job Super. If he signs off on your after hour md'ng I think you'd be good to go.
View attachment 1113647
no matter how you look at it.
even if there is a No Trespassing sign every foot .
Unless your afraid of Being yelled at and called a
"Moron ! Can't ya see the Signs !!!!!!!"
it don't hurt to Ask
unless you knock on these guys door & ask to detect inside the back of the truck
View attachment 1113648
The top dog on the job cannot legally give permission on private property.--Nugs
Looks as if we have a difference of opinion here.
Certainly an option if a person would get a "No" on detecting.![]()
The top dog on the job cannot legally give permission on private property.--Nugs
Yeah contractors can grant access, but on private property somebody still owns that property and still has all the rights associated with it.--Nugs
Generally speaking ,If the contractor is allowed to remove the top 6 inches of the soil they would not be required to make sure any items in that soil are returned to the owner. The contractor would also have the right to remove anything from that site that is not considered beneficial to the project. I could list many more but I think an owner in New York would not have to be contacted by someone in Missouri ,that would have control over a construction site, in order to allow someone to metal detect on that site. A person would have to be really looking for a reason not to detect to have that logic.
Generally speaking ,If the contractor is allowed to remove the top 6 inches of the soil they would not be required to make sure any items in that soil are returned to the owner. The contractor would also have the right to remove anything from that site that is not considered beneficial to the project. I could list many more but I think an owner in New York would not have to be contacted by someone in Missouri ,that would have control over a construction site, in order to allow someone to metal detect on that site. A person would have to be really looking for a reason not to detect to have that logic.
And you might get a YES to both questions......but I might be too much in shock to partake in either one!Sheesk, I don't know how things are in Florida, but doing that here, will be an exercise in futility. It would be like asking him "Can I sleep with your wife?".
I would encourage people to not be discouraged by a large amount of fluff that may not be applicable to your situation in regards to detecting a construction site. Don't be afraid to ask someone in authority on the site. Go there looking for a reason to detect rather than a reason not to detect.
If I get a YES at a construction site (by anyone), I'm not going to second guess their decision or question their authority. The legal burden shifts to them IMO. If someone else higher up in the food chain has a problem with the permission, it's between them two, not me. I did the right thing by asking, it's not my fault (or obligation) to determine what, if any, authority they actually have. I mean, what would constitute authority? Would you want to see their I.D and ask for a copy of the land deed? Jeez guys, we're talking about detecting here, not burying nuclear waste.
This is from my personal copy of the Ohio Department of Transportation's specs.
514.07 Protection of Persons and Property
"If the contractor causes any damage or injury to public or private property, the Contractor shall restore the property to a condition similar or equal to the condition existing before the damage or injury."
View attachment 1114646 View attachment 1114645
How I read it.... "Just fill in the holes"![]()