Why We Feel The Need To Defend the 2nd Amendent

[0121stockpicker]

So the struggle when considering amendment and the importance of who is involved.
Much more important than a union contract or a groups by laws(both important,no offence all) where an added or deleted clause can make major changes to the whole contract/mission.

This is the political system we have and we live in. So when you hear yahoo talking about something is in stone, can't change, is unconstitutional you will now know that they are either uneducated/uninformed to downright lying to you for their own benefit. That's why we all must remain informed and highly skeptical. Best to you.

Eric

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[worldtalker]

This is the political system we have and we live in. So when you hear yahoo talking about something is in stone, can't change, is unconstitutional you will now know that they are either uneducated/uninformed to downright lying to you for their own benefit. That's why we all must remain informed and highly skeptical. Best to you.

Eric

Eric,I totally agree with that.Only thing is,the blood shed,isn't that what our founding Fathers gave to remain Free?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

This is the political system we have and we live in. So when you hear yahoo talking about something is in stone, can't change, is unconstitutional you will now know that they are either uneducated/uninformed to downright lying to you for their own benefit. That's why we all must remain informed and highly skeptical. Best to you.

Eric

The Bill of Rights are written in stone, No American patriot will ever surrender those rights. The Constitution can only be amended through the process laid down in the Constitution, it can not be changed through executive action...

 

[bevo]

A well regulated Militia,being necessary to the security of a free State,the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
Something that needs to be stressed time and time again,is WHY we have our RIGHT
to bear ARMS.This article does not say that you have to be in a militia to bear arms,just that a Militia is necessary.
And who constitutes the militia?Considering that the reason this article is in the bill of rights,is the complaints
that the king had disarmed the people,tells us that the 2nd is there for our own protection against tyranny.
The military is government property,therefore we cannot depend an the government to protect us
from the government,if said system has been usurped.
"...the right of the people..."we are the people and to lose our rights is to lose every thing we stand for.
All the blood spilled to obtain and keep these unalienable rights will have been for nothing.
To shift our country's politics to match more closely those of other countries is the same as burning the constitution
and setting ourselves up with a king.
The writing is very clear,only shysters make it otherwise.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

I "see" a "qualifier" added to the 2nd Amendment by the US Supreme Court "in the future"...

 

[bevo]

like,"all animals are equal,cept some animals are more equal"?

 

[Red James Cash]

What its going to boil down to stockpicker is whether or not you would rather live on your feet or live on your knees.Which do you prefer?

 

[Rebel - KGC]

like,"all animals are equal,cept some animals are more equal"?

THAT'S in the 2nd Amendment...?

 

[bill from lachine]

bevo,

Now you've got me confused.....we just went from the 2nd amendment to Darwin's theory of evolution.....mind you I can usually get pretty confused on my own....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

 

[bill from lachine]

Red,

I had a humorous response to your last post....but, but, but.....if I posted it I'd probably get timed out....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

 

[Rebel - KGC]

bevo,

Now you've got me confused.....we just went from the 2nd amendment to Darwin's theory of evolution.....mind you I can usually get pretty confused on my own....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

ROFL! Gonna be a LONG night...

 

[bevo]

hardeeharhar!
hh

 

[Rebel - KGC]

Red,

I had a humorous response to your last post....but, but, but.....if I posted it I'd probably get timed out....lol.

Regards + HH

Bill

Yeah... it was something about being "REGULAR"...

 

[Red James Cash]

Post away bill,no guts no glory as the saying goes

 

[Chadeaux]

WILL do... is it the "party"...?

Dwight Eisenhower, Abraham Lincoln or George Washington could have done it . . . still would be wrong.

If I were president and did it, it would be wrong. If you or TH or Jeff or Marc or anyone else who were president did it it would still be wrong.

Neither party, skin color, nor any factor other than the wrongdoing is important.

 

[Red James Cash]

Yeah... it was something about being "REGULAR

You probably know all about that dont you rebel?

 

[Chadeaux]

Thank you you've proven the stupidity of all the arguments that say guns should be legal because hammers, bats and knives have been known to kill people. And for the record I agree its a completely stupid statement. Your logic is sound and it works all ways. Excellent.

Stockpicker, Anthrax is not "ARMS".
Saran gas is not "ARMS".

No idea of where you are coming from. Those are weapons of mass destruction, not a gun, a sword, or knife.

 

[Chadeaux]

I "see" a "qualifier" added to the 2nd Amendment by the US Supreme Court "in the future"...

They cannot do that without violating the Constitution. Only CONGRESS can change the Constitution and that only by amendment approved by 2/3 of the States.

 

[Rebel - KGC]

You probably know all about that dont you rebel?

YEP! Dan Active in the morning... Yogurt at night! TRY IT!

 

[Rebel - KGC]

They cannot do that without violating the Constitution. Only CONGRESS can change the Constitution and that only by amendment approved by 2/3 of the States.

I know, and that is what I meant.