What's new

A GUIDE TO VAULT TREASURE HUNTING (Condensed)

Last edited:
A precious metals object such as a gold (dubloon) or silver (reale, peices of 8) coins, or precious metal bars, etc.
The kind of srtuff they haavily loaded their Galeons with, taking spoils back to the King/Queen/Church of Spain..
Like The "Garden Of Gold" laying In the ruins of the wreck Atocha, Mel Fischer & his team had finally discovered.
They also found gold/silver chains & ornate jewelry with Precious stones set in it too, & more.
Well I've held some of the treasures Mel Fisher recovered at his museum. Kinda cool from what I remember.
Got a bigger thrill digging my gold coins out of the dirt. (50BC, 1872)
 
1789705797430.webp
Some tree shaping & carving in the park


1789705797430.webp
 
Well I've held some of the treasures Mel Fisher recovered at his museum. Kinda cool from what I remember.
Got a bigger thrill digging my gold coins out of the dirt. (50BC, 1872)
Sounds like very nice Gold coins finds! I sincerely hope you get to experience an aura at least once.
I think you'd love it, & might even get hooked trying for them. Not that hard, but much patience &
lots of interval shooting. Maybe several thousands of frames to catch the split second metal-sun action.
Though just as it's unpredictable, it's also really surprising & like magic! Thank you sandy1 for exploring it.
 
That looks an awful lot like ordinary lens flare.
Very easy to obtain on any sunny day.
Go out and try to photograph in the middle of the day pointing the camera in a southern direction.

The hour at the beginning of the day, and the end of the day in photography is termed the magic hour.
The lighting is great and there's non of these occurrences happening.

Older model phones had a lot of issues known as the notorious "Samsung Glow" older models as S7-10 eras
Over years of being slid in and out of pockets, the protective chemical coating on the lens glass degrades.
Resulting in getting the iris flare, which has ruined many a photo.
Newer model phones and cameras are improved by camera companies spending $ millions of dollars on R&D to eliminate or minimize these occurrences.
(Though I have a feeling that will be intermitted as undermining the beliefs of Auras that so many have witnessed in photos)

The last sentence brings up and interesting thought why are so many Auras caught in a photo but not with the naked eye?
 
why are so many Auras caught in a photo but not with the naked eye?
Your eye doesn’t have multiple layers of lenses and coatings, plus it has a built-in filter at your brain that takes out the noise.
 
In AirForce due to my job, we had our own photo lab with darkroom, part of my job and training was photography, shooting, developing and printing pictures. I had full access to the photolab on every base I was on daily, I printed thousands of pictures over 4 years.

Light refraction, light diffraction, lens quality, and camera settings can all cause auras/halos...

Light Refraction...Bending of light through a medium creating halos.

Light Diffraction ...Spreading of light waves around obstacles.

Lens Imperfections..Flaws in the lens that distort light.

Camera Settings......Adjustments that affect light interaction with the lens.
 
Very easy to obtain on any sunny day.
Go out and try to photograph in the middle of the day pointing the camera in a southern direction.

The hour at the beginning of the day, and the end of the day in photography is termed the magic hour.
The lighting is great and there's non of these occurrences happening.

Older model phones had a lot of issues known as the notorious "Samsung Glow" older models as S7-10 eras
Over years of being slid in and out of pockets, the protective chemical coating on the lens glass degrades.
Resulting in getting the iris flare, which has ruined many a photo.
Newer model phones and cameras are improved by camera companies spending $ millions of dollars on R&D to eliminate or minimize these occurrences.
(Though I have a feeling that will be intermitted as undermining the beliefs of Auras that so many have witnessed in photos)

The last sentence brings up and interesting thought why are so many Auras caught in a photo but not with the naked eye?
Easy now! No not a lens flare. Very much too large, widespread & intense, to be just that.
Look again, it's consuming & dominating, overwhelming, controllimg the whole picture frame.
Now when have you ever caught a simple, avoidable lens flare, when in partial shadow & pointed
90 degrees away from the late afternoon sun? If you have, got one to show? That's what I thought at
first, my cell phone camera had messed up. I ignored the pic for a time & finally saw it for what it is. I still
can't believe it. Quinoa had said awhile before, that you could possibly catch an aura with some cell phones,
if you could set it up for interval shooting. I had ran down all 3 of my Nikon batteries, & with the sun waning, I
saw some things I was interested in, so grabbed my still charged cell phone. The 2 previous pics were pointed in
the same direction, under the same canopy, same partial sunlight peeking in: 1st shot was the now missing owl &
then a close triangular group of 3 ankle high cut off cedars {Hmm}, then this pic that makes no other real sense. I've
been taking pics a longer time than I'd want to admit now, & a DSLR for over a decade. I've gotten some limited lens
flare with the special lens filters: some, kind of translucent streaky white, green bluish & even pink. They're always alot
smaller & way controlled, not at all dominating the whole pic, even pointed to the sun sinking on the horizon, the flares
where in the middle or to one side of the pic. Sorry, that's not it! .Also, in heavily laden boulder/marker & alignment area
above & east of the giant land turtle, with a nice diamond shell, corner casting an Omega shadow on it's head (Early Fall).
pepperj: I responded to you because I sensed you have a gentler spirit, & besides the first I've ever talked to, have the nice
Diamond Membership Designation, & I think your questions are honest legitimate conversation & deserves honest ahswers.
 
Last edited:
In AirForce due to my job, we had our own photo lab with darkroom, part of my job and training was photography, shooting, developing and printing pictures. I had full access to the photolab on every base I was on daily, I printed thousands of pictures over 4 years.

Light refraction, light diffraction, lens quality, and camera settings can all cause auras/halos...

Light Refraction...Bending of light through a medium creating halos.

Light Diffraction ...Spreading of light waves around obstacles.

Lens Imperfections..Flaws in the lens that distort light.

Camera Settings......Adjustments that affect light interaction with the lens.
Basically it appears what you're saying is based on your photo lab experiences,
we're just inexperienced untrained, uninformed, & there's no such thing as an aura that's projected
up out of the earth from the absorbant molecular non/ferrous metal reaction to the sun's solar rays.
Now that would be Scientifically impossible.
 
No not a lens flare. Very much too large, widespread & intense, to be just that.
Look again, it's consuming & dominating, overwhelming, controllimg the whole picture frame.
Well if it was a lens flare, it would cover the entire frame, because it would cover the lens, therefore covering whatever was in the frame, whether it was one rock or a mountain range. The size of the flare only seems big because of the size of the subject.
 
In AirForce due to my job, we had our own photo lab with darkroom, part of my job and training was photography, shooting, developing and printing pictures. I had full access to the photolab on every base I was on daily, I printed thousands of pictures over 4 years.

Light refraction, light diffraction, lens quality, and camera settings can all cause auras/halos...

Light Refraction...Bending of light through a medium creating halos.

Light Diffraction ...Spreading of light waves around obstacles.

Lens Imperfections..Flaws in the lens that distort light.

Camera Settings......Adjustments that affect light interaction with the lens.


You’re exactly right, TH. A bit of digging reveals these camera “aura” enthusiasts’ camera of choice - the Pentax W10 models - were chosen specifically because their internal hot-mirror filters—which manufacturers install to block infrared light—are weak, allowing a tiny amount of near-infrared light to reach the digital sensor. Supposedly enhancing the ability to “catch auras”. (That piece of information comes directly from David Villanueva’s book “The Successful Treasure Hunter's Secret Manual: Discovering Treasure Auras in the Digital Age”). Unfortunately, it also makes them more susceptible to everything you just mentioned.

Add to that their preferred method for using that camera. The "Time-Lapse" Burst Method. Instead of relying on a single snapshot, their preferred method involves locking the camera onto a tripod aimed at a suspected treasure site, then sets the camera to take thousands of continuous digital photos over a span of several hours. Believers then manually cycle through the frames looking for a brief "flash" which they interpret as the “aura” emitted from buried gold and silver.

In Reality, Camera technicians, such as yourself, and physicists point out that the visual evidence presented in these photographs is caused by well-understood camera optics rather than underground treasure.

Shooting toward low light sources (like dawn or dusk, as directed by Villanueva) through heavy filters creates complex internal lens reflections and geometric flares. Then there’s the problem that taking thousands of rapid-fire exposures on an older digital sensor generates internal heat, causing digital artifacts, hot pixels, and lens refraction from dust motes.

From a psychological perspective, the belief in camera-captured treasure auras provides a fascinating case study in how humans construct meaning, process visual information, and maintain belief systems in the face of contradictory evidence. But I’ll save that for another post. 👍
 
Easy now! No not a lens flare.
The photo you show in #7565 is a classic example of prismatic lens flare. You can easily get rid of it by adding a hood to the camera.

& there's no such thing as an aura that's projected
up out of the earth from the absorbant molecular non/ferrous metal reaction to the sun's solar rays.
Now that would be Scientifically impossible.
Can you show the physics that would support this? Again, if it were true, academics and companies would be aggressively pursuing aura detection, and they are not.
 
Then there’s the problem that taking thousands of rapid-fire exposures on an older digital sensor generates internal heat, causing digital artifacts, hot pixels, and lens refraction from dust motes.
I recently discovered another possibility: cosmic rays. These are particles that randomly strike the earth and when one hits a digital image sensor it causes a bright spot on the image. They hit at about 1 particle per square centimeter per minute so, statistically, you would have to take a whole lotta photos to ever see one.

This is something that can be tested for, and I've got a Pentax W10 on the way so I'll start doing some experiments.
 
Some prime examples would be absolutely educational & quite noteworthy...
Is it fair you can read my message I'm typing, & respond to what I'm saying, while I'm still typing & spell checking my compositions?
LOL, we can not view any message before it is posted, the only way I could do that would be for you to give me remote access to your pc or internet device, which requires a remote access program.
 
Certainly Not ever intentending to offend you in Any Way or steal any justly deserved Thunder, but simply & honestly makng a small, if insignificant contribution.
To correct this, sandy1 my friend, I will refrain from posting on your cool thread for awhile. I'll be around watching, working, there's so many... interesting things to do...
 
Very easy to obtain on any sunny day.
Go out and try to photograph in the middle of the day pointing the camera in a southern direction.

The hour at the beginning of the day, and the end of the day in photography is termed the magic hour.
The lighting is great and there's non of these occurrences happening.

Older model phones had a lot of issues known as the notorious "Samsung Glow" older models as S7-10 eras
Over years of being slid in and out of pockets, the protective chemical coating on the lens glass degrades.
Resulting in getting the iris flare, which has ruined many a photo.
Newer model phones and cameras are improved by camera companies spending $ millions of dollars on R&D to eliminate or minimize these occurrences.
(Though I have a feeling that will be intermitted as undermining the beliefs of Auras that so many have witnessed in photos)

The last sentence brings up and interesting thought why are so many Auras caught in a photo but not with the naked eye?
Your motorized camera(s) allegedly snap a thousand or ten thousand exposures during a session, or even multi-day sessions. Observers seem to describe only one clear aura image found after sifting through all the photos. Why are there not numerous consecutive aura images exposed during the suns "golden hour" showing up - dozens at least, if not more? As far as the naked eye is concerned, a human would have to be looking at exactly the correct location at exactly the correct second to possibly see it. The odds against that are obviously near 100% unless the aura was constant during the "golden hour", which it apparently isn't.

If only one aura image appears during a session, it seems to indicate that the aura is an extremely random geophysical anomaly of some sort, matching the so called random earthquake lights caused by sporadic earth movements. A "gold signal" should be constant, like a metal detector signal. Please explain.
 
LOL, we can not view any message before it is posted, the only way I could do that would be for you to give me remote access to your pc or internet device, which requires a remote access program.
I had deleted that post very quickly when i saw the error of it. Funny, how did you retain a deleted post?
Hanging up my GONE FISHING, PICTURE TAKING, ENJOYING THE LAST OF THE GRUELING MIDWEST SUMMER SUN SIGN.
My friend sandy1 means a whole lot more to me, than to chance an incidental unintended provocation, liking to spoil the starry sky atmospheric electromagnification.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom