goldhunter2
Tenderfoot
- Oct 17, 2018
- 8
- 8
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- Thread starter
- #21
not scammy at all. i've been using it. it really helps trying new ideas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh...?not scammy at all. i've been using it. it really helps trying new ideas.
"NEW ideas"... ?not scammy at all. i've been using it. it really helps trying new ideas.
not scammy at all. i've been using it. it really helps trying new ideas.
HA! C1/C3 are USELESS... RUSES (MHO). C2 is QUESTIONABLE, as a "decoded" thingie; just a Rebel "statement" (DOI) against "Honest Abe"... read it in THAT light.Well, putting all of the other unlimited possibilities aside, how do you even know which of the alleged ciphers is 1 or 3?
You see, since length alone has absolutely no bearing on the content or order of the ciphers, then how can you even be certain that the author's claimed means of numbering the ciphers is accurate? What if his arranged order by length was backwards? Say, instead of long to short it should have been short to long?
You see, this is where the author's story starts to get seriously tripped up, the notion that he was able to arrange the ciphers according to their length and get them correct before he had even seen the C2 plain text. How did he know he was even suppose to number them, 1,2,3?
Clarify MORE... THANKS!"NEW ideas"... ?