BIG NEWS JUST IN!

[bigscoop]

This one. I don't know what place is this, but using the old map and plot it with some other maps, it should be somewhere in the yellow circle. The orange one was the hill referred in page 1 and 3.

View attachment 1905141


View attachment 1905142

You do realize that you are doing "exactly" as Eldo?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[jhonnz41]

You do realize that you are doing "exactly" as Eldo?

If you have another Idea, please share. If you can do better than Eldo please share. I really don't want to focus more on the Beale Paper's as it was dissected multiple times already. I am thinking that if we do the same thing as past researchers did, we will "Exactly" end up like them. Not all things could be found in the book, and not all on the internet. :-D

 

[Garscale]

I didn't read all this thread. I just skipped to the end to see pics of the treasure. Surely it's been recovered since the code was broken?

 

[bigscoop]

If you have another Idea, please share. If you can do better than Eldo please share. I really don't want to focus more on the Beale Paper's as it was dissected multiple times already. I am thinking that if we do the same thing as past researchers did, we will "Exactly" end up like them. Not all things could be found in the book, and not all on the internet. :-D

But you are focusing solely on the Beale Papers.........the entire scope of your baseless and wild speculations and continued manufacturing all be centered around some fantastical yet completely nonexistent connection between a Columbus letter and the narrated treasure tale in the Beale papers. "I am thinking that if we do the same thing as past researchers did, we will "Exactly" end up like them." No, you are obviously not thinking this as it is "exactly" what you are doing... The big difference you fail to realize being between "researchers" VS "hopefuls".....they are not even close to being the same thing at all. The prior deals in facts, the later deals in wild speculations.

 

[jhonnz41]

But you are focusing solely on the Beale Papers.........the entire scope of your baseless and wild speculations and continued manufacturing all be centered around some fantastical yet completely nonexistent connection between a Columbus letter and the narrated treasure tale in the Beale papers. "I am thinking that if we do the same thing as past researchers did, we will "Exactly" end up like them." No, you are obviously not thinking this as it is "exactly" what you are doing... The big difference you fail to realize being between "researchers" VS "hopefuls".....they are not even close to being the same thing at all. The prior deals in facts, the later deals in wild speculations.

Then let me fail in just a year. Not 40 years :-D

I am confused, last time you said to focus on Beale Papers, then now I focused on Beale papers...

 

[jhonnz41]

I know its hard for you to deal with it. I know that you see a lot of people fail, why not let others try the game and fail?

Hehe. This is exciting.

 

[Singlestack Wonder]

Still waiting on the, "BIG NEWS" as stated in the thread title...

 

[jhonnz41]

Still waiting on the, "BIG NEWS" as stated in the thread title...

Im waiting too... I guess I should just "Manufacture" stuff before then..

 

[jhonnz41]

I didn't read all this thread. I just skipped to the end to see pics of the treasure. Surely it's been recovered since the code was broken?

It was long recovered by the party. The 30 men did not die.Maybe some but not all..

Stone was removed by Paschal Buford possibly a member of the party, Buford's was BlackHorse Tavern(moved). The location was in the Johnson-Dooley farm . But we can not conclude because it was "not on Beale Papers" and this was all "manufactured" and that the story is a "hoax".

 

[ECS]

It was long recovered by the party. The 30 men did not die.Maybe some but not all..

Stone was removed by Paschal Buford possibly a member of the party, Buford's was BlackHorse Tavern(moved). The location was in the Johnson-Dooley farm . But we can not conclude because it was "not on Beale Papers" and this was all "manufactured" and that the story is a "hoax".

Is this the famous DIXIE 247 stone ?

 

[Singlestack Wonder]

Is this the famous DIXIE 247 stone ?

Was that stone found at 90 feet as well?

 

[jhonnz41]

The stone that was in Locust Level that came from Peaks of Otter, some were turned into Gravestones, the other was sent to the Washington monument engraved with "From otters summit, Virginias loftiest peak to crown a monument to Virginias noblest son"

 

[bigscoop]

The stone that was in Locust Level that came from Peaks of Otter, some were turned into Gravestones, the other was sent to the Washington monument engraved with "From otters summit, Virginias loftiest peak to crown a monument to Virginias noblest son"

So what? And this only has relevance to the tale in the Beale Papers, "because you personally want it too."
You wrote, "I am confused, last time you said to focus on Beale Papers, then now I focused on Beale papers..." No, no you're not. You're solely focused on making that Columbus letter (your selected key out of thin air) work as a functioning key element for the narration in the Beale Papers....instead of actually researching the details offered in the Beale Paper narration...... I told you before, grab any other adventure document and you will be able to manufacture the exact same type of alternate reality that you're actively pursuing and manufacturing now. NONE OF IT HAVING ANY RELAVANCE OR CONNECTION TO THE DETAILS OFFED IN THE ORIGINAL NARRATION. You are simply rewriting that script to suit. "PERIOD!" You wrote, "Then let me fail in just a year. Not 40 years.." But you have already said that you are already five years into it..... And, that 40 years you reference, not exactly a failure since that time has positively proven that the narration isn't true, as a matter of conclusive facts....lol

 

[jhonnz41]

So what? And this only has relevance to the tale in the Beale Papers, "because you personally want it too."
You wrote, "I am confused, last time you said to focus on Beale Papers, then now I focused on Beale papers..." No, no you're not. You're solely focused on making that Columbus letter (your selected key out of thin air) work as a functioning key element for the narration in the Beale Papers....instead of actually researching the details offered in the Beale Paper narration...... I told you before, grab any other adventure document and you will be able to manufacture the exact same type of alternate reality that you're actively pursuing and manufacturing now. NONE OF IT HAVING ANY RELAVANCE OR CONNECTION TO THE DETAILS OFFED IN THE ORIGINAL NARRATION. You are simply rewriting that script to suit. "PERIOD!" You wrote, "Then let me fail in just a year. Not 40 years.." But you have already said that you are already five years into it..... And, that 40 years you reference, not exactly a failure since that time has positively proven that the narration isn't true, as a matter of conclusive facts....lol

Please read back..."5 years", I did not say that please don't manufacture stories that I did not say."PERIOD".

Why not counter the data that I mentioned instead of focusing on its not working? You are a researcher, you should explain why its not it.:-D please comment on the other thread as to why it does not make sense..

 

[bigscoop]

Please read back..."5 years", I did not say that please don't manufacture stories that I did not say."PERIOD".

Why not counter the data that I mentioned instead of focusing on its not working? You are a researcher, you should explain why its not it.:-D please comment on the other thread as to why it does not make sense..

Look, you're already bouncing all over the place. As for why it makes no sense, "because there is absolutely nothing that you can directly connect to the Beale Paper narration. Zero. Zip." You could be making all of these same claims of connections with any of the following treasure tales........and this is a very-very short list! "Facts first!" And you have absolutely zero supporting evidences or facts that are relevant to the original subject matter. You're doing "exactly" as Eldo. "Exactly!" So go ahead, pick any of these other treasure tales......since you could easily connect them to the Beale Narration in exactly the same fashion you may as well include them all, right?.....

 

[Singlestack Wonder]

But....but..."The Big News".....

 

[bigscoop]

But....but..."The Big News".....

My point in posting all of those other treasure tales was to ask him, "why the Beale Papers?" In other words, what provenance does he have that separates the Beale Papers from all of those other treasure tales? And the answer is obvious, "Nothing other then his own personal preference." He could easily lay all of the same claims and similar presentations on hundreds of other treasure tales "if he chose to do so.".....

 

[jhonnz41]

Look, you're already bouncing all over the place. As for why it makes no sense, "because there is absolutely nothing that you can directly connect to the Beale Paper narration. Zero. Zip." You could be making all of these same claims of connections with any of the following treasure tales........and this is a very-very short list! "Facts first!" And you have absolutely zero supporting evidences or facts that are relevant to the original subject matter. You're doing "exactly" as Eldo. "Exactly!" So go ahead, pick any of these other treasure tales......since you could easily connect them to the Beale Narration in exactly the same fashion you may as well include them all, right?.....
View attachment 1905250View attachment 1905251View attachment 1905252View attachment 1905253

What is this thing? Can give all the book? :-D

Please also read back, I AM NOT CLAIMING THAT I SOLVED IT. this is open for public interpretation, I am not saying that I am right. Its all up to you and your opinion. :-D

If you call it a hoax, imagination, manufactured, out of the book. Its all up to you.. :-D

 

[jhonnz41]

My point in posting all of those other treasure tales was to ask him, "why the Beale Papers?" In other words, what provenance does he have that separates the Beale Papers from all of those other treasure tales? And the answer is obvious, "Nothing other then his own personal preference." He could easily lay all of the same claims and similar presentations on hundreds of other treasure tales "if he chose to do so.".....

well, I could. Whatever you think it is then. Unlike you who have 40 years experience who am I to argue of what is a fact and fiction in Beale's Treasure. Compared to my 1 year(not 5) of research, you clearly have so much knowledge about the topic.

 

[Singlestack Wonder]

Like so many other threads where members claimed, "Oak Island Treasure Found!", "Templar Vault Found!", "Templar Vault and Graves Found!", etc., the threads turn out to be nothing more than fiction...